- From: Fahad Khan <anasfkhan81@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:23:22 +0200
- To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK+N+9h5BD3KM3HhmCed-yOUDCphPrLhjsWf6HyEp=+HK1N+BQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Philipp, I'm afraid I won't be able to attend today. Cheers, Fahad On 4 June 2018 at 12:16, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Dear all, > > thanks for this Ilan. > > @All. I had planned a telco for today as I will not be available for the > next two weeks. > > And here is my proposed definition for an attestation: > > Attestation: An attestation is a reference to a source that proves that > the lexical entry has a certain linguistic property (e.g. a sense). > > I propose we talk at 13:00 today to touch base and see how we continue our > discussion on attestation. > > Talk to you later, > > Philipp. > > Am 02.06.18 um 12:46 schrieb Ilan Kernerman: > > Dear all, > > Following our last call, here are some suggestions: > > · A *citation* consists of a quote from a corpus (text); it may > either (i) include a reference to its origin (*bibl*), or (ii) not. > > o An *attestation* is the reference to a source (*bibl*) without its > actual *citation*. > > § (in other words, *bibl* and *attestation* might be similar, but the > latter is not preceded by a *citation*) > > · An *example of usage* (or *usage example*) is human-crafted, > whether (i) corpus-inspired/derived, or (ii) not. > > o The *example* can consist of either a full sentence or a short phrase > (and could also be a *citation*) > > § (there are different types of examples – mainly of general patterns, > for reception/decoding purposes, active for production/encoding – but that > is probably beyond the scope here) > > This might seem like over-simplifying or distorting matters, but I hope it > is useful for more accurate mapping/tagging. > > I think this does not contradict the concerns raised in Fahad’s article J: > > “Lemon, unlike TEI-DICT, however focuses on capturing the conceptual > content of a lexicon, that is, it takes a primarily lexical view of lexical > resources… Hence there is no conflict here between the demands of fidelity > to the text in its lexical view and the text in its editorial and > typographical view as there is in TEI; lemon simply prioritises the former. > ” > > “…a proper encoding of citations attesting to lexical properties must > take into consideration at least two different kinds of conceptual entity: > citations and attestations” > > Best, > > Ilan > > > -- > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > AG Semantic Computing > Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) > Universität Bielefeld > > Tel: +49 521 106 12249 > Fax: +49 521 106 6560 > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > Office CITEC-2.307 > Universitätsstr. 21-25 > 33615 Bielefeld, NRW > Germany > >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 10:23:49 UTC