W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2017

Re: Teleconference tomorrow at 14:00 CET

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:06:02 +0200
To: John McCrae <john@mccr.ae>
Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <65caca65-eef6-7a48-58ba-5ac21fa8db77@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Thanks a lot John for the minutes!

I will paste them into the wiki.

Greetings,

Philipp.


Am 25.07.17 um 15:27 schrieb John McCrae:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some minutes from the call:
>
> Present: Philipp Cimiano, Julia Bosque-Gil, Manuel Fiorelli, Francesca
> Frontini, Fahad Khan, John McCrae, Elena Montiel, Jorge Gracia, Sander
> Stolk, Morris Alper, Ilan Kernerman, Thierry Declerck
> Apologies: Francis Bond
>
>   * [PC] Focus of telco is on using model for representing existing
>     dictionaries
>   * [PC] Propose introduction of Dictionary and DictionaryEntry, to
>     group distinct lexical entries/senses that would be under the same
>     headword
>   * Dictionary headwords ("entries") often contain multiple
>     part-of-speech, gender, pronunciations
>       o But not always, e.g., OED
>   * Criteria for dividing lexical entries are not clear in traditional
>     dictionaries
>   * [FF?] How does this affect etymology?
>       o [JM] Depends on outcome of diachronicity module
>   * [IK] Is the purpose of OntoLex to model existing dictionaries or
>     should OntoLex dictionaries be "LD-native"?
>       o Modelling existing dictionaries accurately risks incompatibility
>   * [MA] Do we assume each dictionary entry contains a distinct set of
>     lexical entries?
>       o [JM] Add axiom that a lexical entry is part of at most one
>         dictionary entry?
>       o [FK] Axioms are frequently ignored. See the requirement that
>         each sense must have one reference
>           + [JM] This should be revised
>       o [SS] A dictionary entry should be described by the entries it
>         contains
>   * [JG] Original goal of dictionary entries is to be composed of LEs
>     and capture a "view of the dictionary"
>   * [TD] Some dictionaries (e.g., Dictionary of Bavarian Dialects)
>     captures a lot of information on the head word for space reasons,
>     this is not a problem for OntoLex
>   * [JM] Goal of OntoLex is not to accurately represent dictionaries
>     but be useful for applications such as NLP
>       o [FF] We should consider not just use cases in NLP, but also
>         other areas such as DH
>   * [TD] Decomposition should also refer to senses
>       o [JM] A property should be added to support this
>   * [JB] Prefer dictionary entry as a container for lexical senses.
>   * [JM] Why not two classes, one for lexical senses and one for entries?
>       o [PC] Why not use the same class for both?
>           + [JM,JG,MA] This could make things difficult technically
>
> Summary
>
>   * Propose new link from decomp:Component -> ontolex:LexicalSense (to
>     be named)
>   * Introduce a new class grouping lexical entries/lexical senses. Either:
>      1. DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical senses
>      2. DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical entries
>      3. DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical senses and/or lexical
>         entries
>      4. LexicalDictionaryEntry [?] as a group of lexical entries and
>         SenseDictionaryEntry [?] as a group of lexical senses.
>   * Next Meeting: 5th September 14:00 CET (12:00 UTC)
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Philipp Cimiano
> <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>> wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>      the details for the teleconference tomorrow at 14:00 CET can be
>     found here:
>
>     https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2017.7.24,_14-15_pm_CET
>     <https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2017.7.24,_14-15_pm_CET>
>
>     @Julia: can you point to everyone to the examples in the wiki that we
>     can discuss tomorrow? Thanks!
>
>     Talk to you tomorrow.
>
>     Greetings,
>
>     Philipp
>
>
>     --
>     --
>     Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>     AG Semantic Computing
>     Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>     Universität Bielefeld
>
>     Tel: +49 521 106 12249 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>     Fax: +49 521 106 6560 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%206560>
>     Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>     <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>
>     Office CITEC-2.307
>     Universitätsstr. 21-25
>     33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>     Germany
>
>
>

-- 
--
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
AG Semantic Computing
Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
Universität Bielefeld

Tel: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 6560
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Office CITEC-2.307
Universitätsstr. 21-25
33615 Bielefeld, NRW
Germany
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2017 19:06:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:58 UTC