W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2017

Re: Working on best practices for modelling lexicographic resources

From: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:42:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CANzuSaMtAAzX=BbV87YbPxdMsKO6SmrHMBqX2FqUqeu8VaSWNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Dear Philipp,

+1 to this initiative! You can count on UPM for this.

I think that your proposal is a natural continuation of the collection of
modelling issues (about lemon in lexicography) that we started a few months
ago. In fact, I propose to continue expanding the same wiki space
https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Lexicography that we can update
with new issues and with the feedback we got during the ontolex workshop.
Then, a series of best practises will be derived from it, along with a set
of new modelling ingredients (that might be part of a new module


2017-07-12 21:26 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>

> Dear ontolex community,
>     unfortunately, due to family issues, I have not been able to attend
> the Ontolex workshop collocated with the LDK conference in Galway.
> The conference itself was great. Thanks to John, Jorge, Christian,
> Sebastian and Paul for getting it organized!
> Several people have reported to me the topics discussed at ontolex workshop
> It is clear from the reports that there is a significant interest in
> continuing the work on the model and in particular there seems to be a
> lot of interest on working out how the ontolex model can be used to
> model lexicographic resources.
> As this seems to be of interest to the community, I propose we start
> looking into this. I am happy to lead this if I get a little help from
> the community, in particular from UPM (Jorge/Julia).
> I would like to propose two concrete actions:
> 1) I propose that in order to have a concrete goal, we start working on
> a document that summarizes best practices for modelling lexicographic
> resources, building on but also extending the current ontolex vocabulary
> as needed. The document could be example-based along the lines of the
> spec we have issued so far and would allow us to work in an agile and
> cooperative way, agreeing on design issues and choices as we collaborate
> on writing the best practices and guidelines. Once the guidelines are
> written, we can then decide whether we lift some of the proposed
> vocabulary elements or modelling solutions into the status of a new
> module or we simply keep the best practices as an informal document.
> 2) I propose we start again with our regular telcos to foster discussion
> and progress. As the Thursday slot was not very popular, I propose we
> move back to our original Friday 4 pm (CET) slot.
> Let me know what you think.
> Kind regards,
> Philipp.
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany

Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2017 08:43:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:58 UTC