Re: Working on best practices for modelling lexicographic resources

Dear Philipp,

+1 to this initiative! You can count on UPM for this.

I think that your proposal is a natural continuation of the collection of
modelling issues (about lemon in lexicography) that we started a few months
ago. In fact, I propose to continue expanding the same wiki space
https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Lexicography that we can update
with new issues and with the feedback we got during the ontolex workshop.
Then, a series of best practises will be derived from it, along with a set
of new modelling ingredients (that might be part of a new module
eventually).

Best,
Jorge




2017-07-12 21:26 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
:

> Dear ontolex community,
>
>     unfortunately, due to family issues, I have not been able to attend
> the Ontolex workshop collocated with the LDK conference in Galway.
>
> The conference itself was great. Thanks to John, Jorge, Christian,
> Sebastian and Paul for getting it organized!
>
> Several people have reported to me the topics discussed at ontolex workshop
>
> It is clear from the reports that there is a significant interest in
> continuing the work on the model and in particular there seems to be a
> lot of interest on working out how the ontolex model can be used to
> model lexicographic resources.
>
> As this seems to be of interest to the community, I propose we start
> looking into this. I am happy to lead this if I get a little help from
> the community, in particular from UPM (Jorge/Julia).
>
> I would like to propose two concrete actions:
>
> 1) I propose that in order to have a concrete goal, we start working on
> a document that summarizes best practices for modelling lexicographic
> resources, building on but also extending the current ontolex vocabulary
> as needed. The document could be example-based along the lines of the
> spec we have issued so far and would allow us to work in an agile and
> cooperative way, agreeing on design issues and choices as we collaborate
> on writing the best practices and guidelines. Once the guidelines are
> written, we can then decide whether we lift some of the proposed
> vocabulary elements or modelling solutions into the status of a new
> module or we simply keep the best practices as an informal document.
>
> 2) I propose we start again with our regular telcos to foster discussion
> and progress. As the Thursday slot was not very popular, I propose we
> move back to our original Friday 4 pm (CET) slot.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Philipp.
>
>
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
>
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
>
>
>
>


-- 
Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
http://jogracia.url.ph/web/