Re: ontolex module ready for final discussion

Ooops I just realised i sent my first mail just to philipp and not to the
rest of the list....my bad! Here it is

Dear Philipp, list,
I just wanted to ask for clarification on something. You talk about there
being just one written representation per language tag but then how would
you deal with the case of a language that uses two different scripts --
without having to make the potentially fraught, decision of which is the
default script? For example, Punjabi is written using two completely
different scripts, Gurmukhi and Shahmukhi, and from what I understand there
is no default standard script for the language
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjabi_language#Writing_systems. What if I
want to construct a Punjabi language lexicon in which I have both forms
available (and without having to have two different languages for two
different scripts)?

Also, and  this isn't necessarily a problem for the core model, but some of
the examples in the document are a bit odd.
 - the bank example: the two different meanings attached to the word form
bank are usually regarded as two different, homophonous, entries. Perhaps
it would be better to use bank_as_buidling and bank_as_institution in the
given example since one could argue that these should go under the same
entity.
- Example 9:I don't think it's a good idea to have Spouse as the reference
or denotation of the word "to marry"
- Example 11: To say that a topic is the *subject* of the sense of a word
is a bit odd -- it seems a bit ontologically/metaphoricallly bothersome to
me -- so I don't know how appropriate the use of the dc property is in this
case. Maybe it's better to have something more like context of use.

Finally, the lemon LIAM link is dead.
Cheers,
Fahad and Francesca

On 4 May 2015 at 22:19, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>  the core module is now ready for the final discussion this week. Please
> check the current version of the specification:
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Final_Model_Specification#Core
>
> The ontologies and code of examples is available here:
>
> https://github.com/cimiano/ontolex.git
>
> Please send me any final issues / changes you would like to have
> implemented in the specification by Thursday.
>
> Looking forward to our discussion on Friday!
>
> Access details are here, as usual:
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2015.5.8,_16-17_pm_CET
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philipp.
>
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
>
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
>
>
>