- From: Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:17:31 +0100
- To: "John P. McCrae" <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>, Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
- Message-ID: <CAGDmdGhNHJB1g73kvTzjwwTeq+u0HPqhg=anv6H1gWFjT7iZdw@mail.gmail.com>
Dear John, All see my answer below. 2015-01-23 14:59 GMT+01:00 John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Manuel Fiorelli < > manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com> wrote: > > *7. Properties avgNumOfLexicalization, percentage, lexicalizations no > longer on Lexicalization* >> >> This is something that (if I remember correctly) was still under >> discussion. However, in the attached document I was open to the possibility >> to include these properties the LexicalizationSet. >> >> The change you propose would dramatically change the semantics of the >> model. Currently, a coverage is only a container of statistics. With your >> change in place, a coverage would be a dataset, which contains (I presume) >> the lexicalization triples. >> > OK, I think the important thing is that properties such as lexicalizations > can be added to the Lexicalization, it didn't look like that from the > diagram > > As for changing the semantics, I disagree. The lexicalization is not truly > a 'dataset' in most cases as it is instead may be published as part of a > lexicon (or even part of an ontology). Instead it is a dataset in the sense > that it some set of triples, in this case the triples linking an ontology > to a lexicon, thus for me a resource coverage is also a dataset, that is > the set of triples linking a lexicon to a selection of the ontology's > entities by type. > In the model, we have the following axiom lime:LexicalizationSet rdfs:subClass void:Dataset therefore, each lexicalizationSet is a dataset, in the sense of being a set of triples, i.e. representing the association between ontology entities and lexical entries. As you argue, it may be a subset of another dataset. On this last point, maybe we were a bit ambiguous in previous telcos/emails. Suppose that I want to distribute an ontolex:Lexicon together with a lime:LexicalizationSet, what is the appropriate structure of the data? a) *The lexicon also contains the triples related to the lexicalizationSet* :myLexicon a ontolex:Lexicon . :myLexicon void:subset :myLexicalizationSet . :myLexicalizationSet a lime:LexicalizationSet. b) *The lexicon does not contain the triples related to the lexicalization; instead, both the lexicon and the lexicalizationSet are part of a larger dataset.* :myDataset a void:Dataset . :myDataset void:subset :myLexicon . :myDataset void:subset :myLexicalizationSet . :myLexicon a ontolex:Lexicon . :myLexicalizationSet a lime:LexicaliztionSet. I thought that we agreed on the solution b), in order to completely remove "semantic" information from the lexicon. What is your position? -- Manuel Fiorelli
Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 14:17:59 UTC