- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:33:47 +0200
- To: Francis Bond <bond@ieee.org>
- CC: John McCrae <johnmccrae@gmail.com>, Alessandro Oltramari <aoltrama@andrew.cmu.edu>, Gil FRANCOPOULO <gil.francopoulo@wanadoo.fr>, Guido Vetere <gvetere@it.ibm.com>, "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea <guadalupe.aguado@upm.es>
- Message-ID: <5237E9BB.1010701@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Dear all,
first of all, a brief reminder that we will not have any ontolex
telco this week as many people were travelling.
Actually, as it happens, I will be also travelling/busy on the next
three Fridays: on the 27th of September, on the 4th of October and on
the 11th of October.
Paul: can you lead the telco on these days to further discuss the modules?
An alternative is that we move the discussion to email for the next
three weeks.
Regards,
Philipp.
Am 17.09.13 03:47, schrieb Francis Bond:
> I would also vote for keeping the name the same. I find having
> multiple names for similar things much more confusing than calling
> incremental improvements with the same name :-).
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:21 PM, John McCrae <johnmccrae@gmail.com
> <mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think Gil puts the issue quite well, renaming would be a "fresh
> start". I just don't think we need a "fresh start" for several
> reasons... firstly that the "lemon" brand is proving quite
> successful, entirely due to the hard work of many members of this
> group.
>
> Secondly, the model is not fundamentally new but builds on the
> existing lemon core model, see attached diagram to illustrate my
> point. I don't think there should be need for confusion between
> the models as they are fundamentally iterations in the same direction.
>
> Finally, looking to the future development of the model, I first
> note we are a long way behind our original schedule. As it seems
> that we have ended up more or less building on the work of Lemon,
> I suggest we take this as a template for the module work. i.e.,
> take as a basis the existing modules in Lemon (where extant) and
> then discuss how to improve them.
>
> Taking this in mind perhaps the best proposal would be that of
> Aldo, where Lemon is used for the wider context of the model
> created by the group and OntoLex used for this specific "core"
> part of the model. Thus this core model would be "Lemon OntoLex"
> and the modules would take names such as "Lemon Syntax", "Lemon
> Metadata" (or "Lemon Lime")
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Alessandro Oltramari
> <aoltrama@andrew.cmu.edu <mailto:aoltrama@andrew.cmu.edu>> wrote:
>
> As mentioned in a previous message, I agree with Guido and
> Gil's stance.
> Apologies for not calling in today.
> Best,
>
> Alessandro
>
> On Sep 13, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Gil FRANCOPOULO wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>> I agree with Guido.
>>
>>
>> The new model is broader, defined with different people,
>> under a different administrative umbrella, so this is different.
>>
>>
>> Using the name "lemon" is confusing.
>>
>>
>> In the future, if somebody says "lemon", we need to ask: what
>> "lemon" are you talking about ? The old one or the new one.
>>
>>
>> Using the term "ontolex", means a fresh and clean start, for
>> new adventures...
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Gil Francopoulo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Message du 13/09/13 14:45
>> > De : "Guido Vetere"
>> > A : "public-ontolex@w3.org <mailto:public-ontolex@w3.org>"
>> > Copie à : "Philipp Cimiano" , "Guadalupe Aguado de Cea"
>> , johnmccrae@gmail.com <mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com>
>> > Objet : Re: ontolex telco tomorrow 15:00 CET
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > although, as Shakespeare, said "a rose by any other
>> name would smell as sweet", I think that names matter. I
>> think that keeping 'lemon' (or a variant) would suggest
>> that the work we are doing is basically a follow-on of
>> the Lemon initiative, which, at the time the group has
>> been established, was not the case, at least in my
>> understanding. Hence, I think that keeping the original
>> 'ontolex' name is a better option.
>> >
>> > I'm unable to attend the call this evening, sorry about
>> that.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Guido Vetere
>> > Manager, Center for Advanced Studies IBM Italia
>> > _________________________________________________
>> > Rome Trento
>> > Via Sciangai 53 Via Sommarive 18
>> > 00144 Roma, Italy 38123 Povo in Trento
>> > +39 (0)6 59662137 <tel:%2B39%20%280%296%2059662137>
>> >
>> > Mobile: +39 3357454658 <tel:%2B39%203357454658>
>> > _________________________________________________
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> *John McCrae *
>> > Sent by: johnmccrae@gmail.com
>> <mailto:johnmccrae@gmail.com>
>>
>> > 13/09/2013 11:43
>>
>>
>> To
>> Guadalupe Aguado de Cea
>> cc
>> Philipp Cimiano , "public-ontolex@w3.org
>> <mailto:public-ontolex@w3.org>"
>> Subject
>> Re: ontolex telco tomorrow 15:00 CET
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I apologise I will also not be able to attend as I am
>> travelling today. I wanted to make a quick couple of
>> points about the naming of the model.
>> >
>> > Firstly, the model is not drastically new in fact in
>> terms of URIs 15 of the properties are exactly the same
>> as they are in the original /lemon/ core where as only 9
>> are new introductions, and 4 are not carried over from
>> the ontolex core (although these should be included in
>> modules).
>> >
>> > Also, I am here at RANLP and /lemon/ has been mentioned
>> in several talks including one of the keynotes, at
>> tutorials and many times in the NLP&LOD workshop. Many
>> people who I talked to about the naming of the model
>> seemed not keen accept a change of name.
>> >
>> > For these two reasons I feel that we really should to
>> keep lemon in the name but would be happy with Lemon2 or
>> W3C-Lemon as a name
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Guadalupe Aguado de
>> Cea <guadalupe.aguado@upm.es
>> <mailto:guadalupe.aguado@upm.es>> wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I won't be able to join the telco as I have a meeting
>> in another town.
>> > As for the name of the model, the last 2 suggestions
>> proposed by Phillipp and Aldo: lemon2, and lemon-W3C
>> could be Ok, though I'm more inclined to the first one,
>> lemon2. Exactly for the reasons given by Philipp.
>> >
>> > I know that Elena & Jorge will attend the telco, so
>> they'll tell me about the commitments and the modules..
>> > Best regards
>> >
>> > Lupe
>> >
>> > El 12/09/2013 14:38, Philipp Cimiano escribió:
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > this is a gentle reminder that we will have our
>> regular ontolex telco tomorrow Friday at the regular time.
>> >
>> > See access details here:
>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2013.13.09,_15-16_pm_CET
>> >
>> > The agenda from my side is as follows:
>> >
>> > 1) Modules: decide which modules need to be developed
>> and which use cases will drive them, fix responsibles for
>> module development
>> > 2) Name of the model: discuss different points of view
>> > 3) Linking: what to link to
>> >
>> > I look forward to talking to you all on Friday.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Philipp.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Guadalupe Aguado de Cea
>> > Departamento de Lingüística Aplicada
>> > Miembro del Ontology Engineering Group -OEG
>> > Facultad de Informática
>> > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>> > Campus de Montegancedo, sn
>> > 28660, Boadilla del Monte, Spain
>> >
>> > Home page: www.oeg-upm.net <http://www.oeg-upm.net/>
>> > e-mail: guadalupe.aguado@upm.es
>> <mailto:guadalupe.aguado@upm.es>
>> > Telef.: 34-91-3367415
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> > IBM Italia S.p..A.
>>
>> > Sede Legale: Circonvallazione Idroscalo - 20090 Segrate
>> (MI)
>> > Cap. Soc. euro 347.256.998,80
>> > C. F. e Reg. Imprese MI 01442240030 - Partita IVA
>> 10914660153
>> > Società con unico azionista
>> > Società soggetta all’attività di direzione e
>> coordinamento di International Business Machines Corporation
>> >
>> > (Salvo che sia diversamente indicato sopra / Unless
>> stated otherwise above)
>>
>
> *_Alessandro Oltramari_*
> Research Associate
> Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University
> 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213
> Tel.: +1-412-268-6284 <tel:%2B1-412-268-6284> Fax.:
> +1-412-268-2798 <tel:%2B1-412-268-2798> Mobile:
> +1-412-689-1514 <tel:%2B1-412-689-1514>
>
> Homepage: http://fms.psy.cmu.edu/member/aoltrama/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessandrooltramari
> Twitter/Skype: oltramale
> /
> /
> "There’s no such thing as the unknown– only things temporarily
> hidden, temporarily not understood.” [Capt. J.T. Kirk]
> "To dare is to lose one's footing momentarily. Not to dare is
> to lose oneself." [S. Kierkegaard]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
> Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
> Nanyang Technological University
--
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
Raum 2.307
Universität Bielefeld
Inspiration 1
33619 Bielefeld
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 05:34:19 UTC