- From: John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:05:22 +0200
- To: Alessandro Oltramari <aoltrama@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Cc: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC5njqpS_vOtPtiCV6DfiUkCX_aj6-b1-_rUfzu6ASxrBh34Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Alessandro, Is this not question 5? http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Core_Model_Poll#Should_the_core_be_defined_in_separate_namespace_from_further_modules.3F Regards, John On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Alessandro Oltramari < aoltrama@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: > Something like, > > "Do you agree with the modular stance that any future extension of the > core model should adopt a distinct namespace?" > > As Philipp was pointing out, modularity is not an issue in the current > stage, since every class and relation are "core" right now. > > But suppose we want to extend the OntoLex model, e.g. to the phonological > domain: using another namespace would be a neater approach. In general, I'd > be in favor to recommend the modular approach in the guidelines (if > any) of the OntoLex model. > > In general, I think we want to avoid as much as possible that people add > their won stuff to the core model, eventually modifying it. We can't forbid > it, but I guess we would prefer way more that they import the OntoLex Model > as a separate module to be linked to some ontology. > > Well, this is how I would use it at least. > > My two cents, > > Alessandro > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 6:16 AM, John McCrae wrote: > > So which question do you want to add then? > > John > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Philipp Cimiano < > cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > >> Yes, >> >> Philipp. >> >> Am 29.07.13 12:06, schrieb John McCrae: >> >> The "core" is everything we have discussed thus far (forms, entries, >> senses, concepts, references, lexica), right? >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Philipp Cimiano < >> cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I think it is too preliminary, but we can add the question to see what >>> comes out ;-) >>> >>> Philipp. >>> >>> Am 26.07.13 15:56, schrieb Alessandro Oltramari: >>> >>> I'm totally in favor of adopting a modular approach. Question: do we >>> have a clear idea about what represents the core ontology of ontolex? >>> Alessandro >>> On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Jorge Gracia wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would add also a question about modularity, i.e., by defining the >>> core ontology in its own namespace, and the other extensions each one >>> in their own namespace and importing the core ontology. Although I >>> understand that this is not urgent as we are now deciding about the >>> core model only. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jorge >>> >>> 2013/7/26 John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> In preparation for today's telco, here is the page that we will use to >>> >>> collect answers to polls on issues related to the model. The current >>> >>> questions are as proposed by myself, Philipp and Paul. More questions >>> can of >>> >>> course be suggested in the telco or by email. >>> >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Core_Model_Poll >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jorge Gracia, PhD >>> Ontology Engineering Group >>> Artificial Intelligence Department >>> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid >>> http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/ >>> >>> >>> *Alessandro Oltramari* >>> Research Associate >>> Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University >>> 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213 >>> Tel.: +1-412-268-6284 Fax.: +1-412-268-2798 Mobile: >>> +1-412-689-1514 >>> Homepage: http://fms.psy.cmu.edu/member/aoltrama >>> Twitter/Skype: oltramale >>> *"There’s no such thing as the unknown– only things temporarily >>> hidden, temporarily not understood.” (*Capt. J.T. Kirk) >>> *"*To dare is to lose one's footing momentarily. Not to dare is >>> to lose oneself." (S. Kierkegaard) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano >>> Semantic Computing Group >>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) >>> University of Bielefeld >>> >>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249 >>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412 >>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >>> >>> Room H-127 >>> Morgenbreede 39 >>> 33615 Bielefeld >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano >> Semantic Computing Group >> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) >> University of Bielefeld >> >> Phone: +49 521 106 12249 >> Fax: +49 521 106 12412 >> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >> >> Room H-127 >> Morgenbreede 39 >> 33615 Bielefeld >> >> > > *Alessandro Oltramari* > Research Associate > Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University > 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213 > Tel.: +1-412-268-6284 Fax.: +1-412-268-2798 Mobile: +1-412-689-1514 > Homepage: http://fms.psy.cmu.edu/member/aoltrama > Twitter/Skype: oltramale > *"There’s no such thing as the unknown– only things temporarily hidden, > temporarily not understood.” (*Capt. J.T. Kirk) > *"*To dare is to lose one's footing momentarily. Not to dare is to lose > oneself." (S. Kierkegaard) > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 13:05:54 UTC