W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Poll site on Wiki

From: John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:05:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC5njqpS_vOtPtiCV6DfiUkCX_aj6-b1-_rUfzu6ASxrBh34Jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Oltramari <aoltrama@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Hi Alessandro,

Is this not question 5?
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Core_Model_Poll#Should_the_core_be_defined_in_separate_namespace_from_further_modules.3F

Regards,
John


On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Alessandro Oltramari <
aoltrama@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:

> Something like,
>
> "Do you agree with the modular stance that any future extension of the
> core model should adopt a distinct namespace?"
>
> As Philipp was pointing out, modularity is not an issue in the current
> stage, since every class and relation are "core" right now.
>
> But suppose we want to extend the OntoLex model, e.g. to the phonological
> domain: using another namespace would be a neater approach. In general, I'd
> be in favor to recommend the modular approach in the guidelines  (if
> any) of the OntoLex model.
>
> In general, I think we want to avoid as much as possible that people add
> their won stuff to the core model, eventually modifying it. We can't forbid
> it, but I guess we would prefer way more that they import the OntoLex Model
> as a separate module to be linked to some ontology.
>
> Well, this is how I would use it at least.
>
> My two cents,
>
> Alessandro
>
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 6:16 AM, John McCrae wrote:
>
> So which question do you want to add then?
>
> John
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Philipp Cimiano <
> cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>
>>  Yes,
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>> Am 29.07.13 12:06, schrieb John McCrae:
>>
>> The "core" is everything we have discussed thus far (forms, entries,
>> senses, concepts, references, lexica), right?
>>
>>  Regards,
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Philipp Cimiano <
>> cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>>
>>>  Dear all,
>>>
>>>  I think it is too preliminary, but we can add the question to see what
>>> comes out ;-)
>>>
>>> Philipp.
>>>
>>> Am 26.07.13 15:56, schrieb Alessandro Oltramari:
>>>
>>> I'm totally in favor of adopting a modular approach. Question: do we
>>> have a clear idea about what represents the core ontology of ontolex?
>>> Alessandro
>>>  On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Jorge Gracia wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> I would add also a question about modularity, i.e., by defining the
>>> core ontology in its own namespace, and the other extensions each one
>>> in their own namespace and importing the core ontology. Although I
>>> understand that this is not urgent as we are now deciding about the
>>> core model only.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jorge
>>>
>>> 2013/7/26 John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>  In preparation for today's telco, here is the page that we will use to
>>>
>>> collect answers to polls on issues related to the model. The current
>>>
>>> questions are as proposed by myself, Philipp and Paul. More questions
>>> can of
>>>
>>> course be suggested in the telco or by email.
>>>
>>>
>>>  http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Core_Model_Poll
>>>
>>>
>>>  Regards,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jorge Gracia, PhD
>>> Ontology Engineering Group
>>> Artificial Intelligence Department
>>> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>>> http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/
>>>
>>>
>>>          *Alessandro Oltramari*
>>>  Research Associate
>>>  Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University
>>>  5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213
>>>  Tel.:  +1-412-268-6284  Fax.: +1-412-268-2798     Mobile:
>>> +1-412-689-1514
>>>  Homepage: http://fms.psy.cmu.edu/member/aoltrama
>>>   Twitter/Skype: oltramale
>>>  *"There’s no such thing as the unknown– only things temporarily
>>> hidden, temporarily not understood.” (*Capt. J.T. Kirk)
>>>         *"*To dare is to lose one's footing momentarily. Not to dare is
>>> to lose oneself." (S. Kierkegaard)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>>> Semantic Computing Group
>>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>>> University of Bielefeld
>>>
>>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
>>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>>
>>> Room H-127
>>> Morgenbreede 39
>>> 33615 Bielefeld
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>> Semantic Computing Group
>> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>> University of Bielefeld
>>
>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>
>> Room H-127
>> Morgenbreede 39
>> 33615 Bielefeld
>>
>>
>
> *Alessandro Oltramari*
> Research Associate
> Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University
> 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213
> Tel.:  +1-412-268-6284  Fax.: +1-412-268-2798     Mobile: +1-412-689-1514
> Homepage: http://fms.psy.cmu.edu/member/aoltrama
> Twitter/Skype: oltramale
> *"There’s no such thing as the unknown– only things temporarily hidden,
> temporarily not understood.” (*Capt. J.T. Kirk)
> *"*To dare is to lose one's footing momentarily. Not to dare is to lose
> oneself." (S. Kierkegaard)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 29 July 2013 13:05:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:57:30 UTC