Re: Poll site on Wiki

I'm totally in favor of adopting a modular approach. Question: do we have a clear idea about what represents the core ontology of ontolex?
On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:06 AM, Jorge Gracia wrote:

> Hi,
> I would add also a question about modularity, i.e., by defining the
> core ontology in its own namespace, and the other extensions each one
> in their own namespace and importing the core ontology. Although I
> understand that this is not urgent as we are now deciding about the
> core model only.
> Regards,
> Jorge
> 2013/7/26 John McCrae <>:
>> Hi all,
>> In preparation for today's telco, here is the page that we will use to
>> collect answers to polls on issues related to the model. The current
>> questions are as proposed by myself, Philipp and Paul. More questions can of
>> course be suggested in the telco or by email.
>> Regards,
>> John
> -- 
> Jorge Gracia, PhD
> Ontology Engineering Group
> Artificial Intelligence Department
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Alessandro Oltramari
Research Associate
Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University
5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh PA 15213
Tel.:  +1-412-268-6284 	Fax.: +1-412-268-2798     Mobile: +1-412-689-1514
Twitter/Skype: oltramale 
"There’s no such thing as the unknown– only things temporarily hidden, temporarily not understood.” (Capt. J.T. Kirk)
"To dare is to lose one's footing momentarily. Not to dare is to lose oneself." (S. Kierkegaard)

Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 14:03:20 UTC