Re: Question about ODRL 2.0 Common Vocabulary

For ODRL 1.1, OMA specification is probably the best in terms of
availability and implementation.

On Thursday, February 26, 2015, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
>  my purpose is to conduct a research about ODRL
>> 1.1 and ODRL 2.0 for my graduation thesis, with some practical example
>> about real and study cases.
>>
>
> Without knowing much details about the scope of your thesis, I would
> suggest you to
> have a look at the upcoming ODRL 2.1 Core Model[1] and Vocabulary
> Specification[2], too.
> There are some extensive differences between 2.1 and 2.0, not to mention
> 2.1/2.0 to 1.1..
>
> cheers,
> simon
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-
> constraint-draft-changes/
> [2] https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-common-
> vocabulary-constraint-draft-changes/
>
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
>
> Am 2015-02-25 12:44, schrieb Agnese Farinelli:
>
>> Good morning,
>> I wrote you this email for clarify, if I am allowed, a few doubt about
>> ODRL 2.0 Common Vocabulary and the possibility to extend this
>> vocabulary with dedicated profiles. In your ODRL 2.0 Common Vocabulary
>> final specification
>> (https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/vocab/#section-3 [1]) I read
>> that the possibility to extend the Common Vocabulary is concrete but I
>> didn't find any technical implementation for this kind of extension
>> (differently, I found all the informations what I need about the
>> extension of Core Model in the Core Model concrete XML Schema). I
>> forget to tell you that I am an Information Technology student in
>> University of Milan: my purpose is to conduct a research about ODRL
>> 1.1 and ODRL 2.0 for my graduation thesis, with some practical example
>> about real and study cases. I need to extend the ODRL 2.0 Common
>> Vocabulary with some specific permissions and constraints (and other
>> stuff, of course) what are more adapted to define licences over my
>> study cases.
>> So, my question is: where can I find a concrete example about Common
>> Vocabulary extension? Something like an .xsd file for ODRL 1.1 where I
>> can use something like the ODRL 1.1 SubstitutionGroup to define new
>> permissions or constraints. Always if this is possible, because I
>> found several technical reports and specification documents about
>> ideas or projects for future Community Profiles, but I didn't find any
>> examples or implementations of this kind of projects.
>> Thanks a lot for your attention, and I ask you to forgive me for my
>> bad english.
>> I am waiting for an answer.
>> My best regards.
>>
>> Farinelli Agnese
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/vocab/#section-3
>>
>
>

-- 
Blog: http://idiots-mind.blogspot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------
Life's a gamble - take a chance