- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:38:41 +0100
- To: Agnese Farinelli <agnese.farinelli@studenti.unimi.it>
- Cc: public-odrl@w3.org
Hi! > my purpose is to conduct a research about ODRL > 1.1 and ODRL 2.0 for my graduation thesis, with some practical example > about real and study cases. Without knowing much details about the scope of your thesis, I would suggest you to have a look at the upcoming ODRL 2.1 Core Model[1] and Vocabulary Specification[2], too. There are some extensive differences between 2.1 and 2.0, not to mention 2.1/2.0 to 1.1.. cheers, simon [1] http://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-core-model-constraint-draft-changes/ [2] https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/work/2-0-common-vocabulary-constraint-draft-changes/ --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2015-02-25 12:44, schrieb Agnese Farinelli: > Good morning, > I wrote you this email for clarify, if I am allowed, a few doubt about > ODRL 2.0 Common Vocabulary and the possibility to extend this > vocabulary with dedicated profiles. In your ODRL 2.0 Common Vocabulary > final specification > (https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/vocab/#section-3 [1]) I read > that the possibility to extend the Common Vocabulary is concrete but I > didn't find any technical implementation for this kind of extension > (differently, I found all the informations what I need about the > extension of Core Model in the Core Model concrete XML Schema). I > forget to tell you that I am an Information Technology student in > University of Milan: my purpose is to conduct a research about ODRL > 1.1 and ODRL 2.0 for my graduation thesis, with some practical example > about real and study cases. I need to extend the ODRL 2.0 Common > Vocabulary with some specific permissions and constraints (and other > stuff, of course) what are more adapted to define licences over my > study cases. > So, my question is: where can I find a concrete example about Common > Vocabulary extension? Something like an .xsd file for ODRL 1.1 where I > can use something like the ODRL 1.1 SubstitutionGroup to define new > permissions or constraints. Always if this is possible, because I > found several technical reports and specification documents about > ideas or projects for future Community Profiles, but I didn't find any > examples or implementations of this kind of projects. > Thanks a lot for your attention, and I ask you to forgive me for my > bad english. > I am waiting for an answer. > My best regards. > > Farinelli Agnese > > Links: > ------ > [1] https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/two/vocab/#section-3
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2015 07:39:11 UTC