- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:48:39 +0200
- To: public-odrl@w3.org
I think a digital license should not try to solve the problems of existing licenses, but to represent them --the 'non-commercial' or the 'educative' purposes appear and will keep on appearing in the text licenses, on despite of their ambiguities. If I had to preserve a text license, this would be a key term I would store, certainly. Víctor El 07/04/2015 15:02, Mo McRoberts escribió: > Interjecting briefly: the issue with all of these is that they’re really > poorly-defined, legally-speaking, and even when one can arrive at a > definition, the definition varies quite significantly by jurisdiction, so > it’s really difficult to specify what ‘educational use’ means. > > Self-directed learning? Affiliated with a recognised institution? > On-premises, or off? Logging in with an academic auth scheme (at which > point, why not just specify that members of that scheme can use it)? What > about corporate training schemes, particularly where they result in an > accredited qualification? > > You get the idea :) > > > Creative Commons has gone for years without ever being able to define what > ‘non-commercial’ actually means - and tends to lean slightly towards > recommending that people probably shouldn’t rely on it meaning what they > think it does, especially internationally, so it’s more often than not > better to not bother. > > M. > > -- > Mo McRoberts - Chief Technical Architect - Archives & Digital Public Space, > Zone 2.12, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA, > MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ, > 0141 422 6036 (Internal: 07311707) - PGP key CEBCF03E > > > > > > > On 2015-04-07 12:22, "Víctor Rodríguez Doncel" <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es> > wrote: > >> I have also found this requirement, in particular among these categories: >> >> personal_use - educational - research - commercial >> >> Regards, >> Víctor >> >> El 07/04/2015 14:15, Renato Iannella escribió: >>>> On 3 Apr 2015, at 3:21 am, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd like to check one last time with the group, about my request if >>>> ODRL could feature a resource to denote the "educational" purpose: >>>> >>>> As per our case >>>> >>>> https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/wiki/Europeana/DPLA_In_Copyright_-_Edu >>>> cational_Use_Only >>>> it would be great if we could re-use something rather than minting our >>>> own http://rightstatements.org/purpose/education . >>> Hi Antoine, thanks for the suggestion... >>> >>> "educational" use is a common term/theme used by many industries...so >>> it does make sense to have this in the common vocabulary. >>> >>> What do others think?? >>> >>> Cheers... >>> Renato Iannella >>> Semantic Identity >>> http://semanticidentity.com >>> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel >> D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) >> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial >> ETS de Ingenieros Informáticos >> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid >> >> Campus de Montegancedo s/n >> Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain >> Tel. (+34) 91336 3753 >> Skype: vroddon3 >> >> > > ----------------------------- > http://www.bbc.co.uk > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and > may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in > error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the > information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender > immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails > sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to > this. > ----------------------------- -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial ETS de Ingenieros Informáticos Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3753 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 07:41:56 UTC