- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:08:31 +0200
- To: public-odrl@w3.org
As a reminder: - in MPEG-21 REL, there is an <AllPrincipals> element in their XML. - in XACML 1.0, there was a <AnySubject> element (and AnyAction / AnyResource). In subsequent versions, it was removed. It was said that the effect of missing it out was exactly the same. Regards, Víctor El 19/09/2013 15:48, Mo McRoberts escribió: > Hi Cindy, > > I wonder if 'public' has unintended connotations that 'everyone' doesn't? i.e., 'everyone' is exactly that, whereas 'public' implies an (undefined) subset of everyone? > > M. > > On 2013-Sep-19, at 14:36, Cindy Lewis <cindy.lewis@me.com> > wrote: > >> Could we use "Public" as the vocabulary word or fixed ID for "everyone"? >> >> All other "fixed" ids of interest would all be concerned with people permissioned by the Assignee. For example, a "subscriber" or an "endorser" >> >> Some possible fixed ids: >> Public >> Subscriber >> Endorser >> Licensee >> >> On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Mo McRoberts wrote: >> >>> On 2013-Sep-19, at 13:38, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 18 Sep 2013, at 01:42, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This sounds like something perhaps could be added to the vocabulary to indicate the conceptual Party representing 'everyone' and which can be used as a @uid wherever that's needed? >>>> We could...what would it look like?...and are there other "fixed" ids of interest? >>> In the RDF variant, we'd express it as a named individual, something like >>> >>> :everyone a :All ; >>> rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ; >>> vs:term_status "testing" ; >>> rdfs:label "Everyone"@en ; >>> rdfs:comment "This is a pre-defined party which can be used when explicitly referring to the set of all possible parties"@en . >>> >>> I'm not sure how it works in the XSD, I'm even less of an expert there :) >>> >>> I'm not sure about fixed IDs for parties, once we've done one adding others should be technically easy if there's consensus. >>> >>> M. >>> >>> -- >>> Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development, >>> Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA, >>> MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ, >>> 0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E >>> >>> >>> >>> ----------------------------- >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk >>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and >>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. >>> If you have received it in >>> error, please delete it from your system. >>> Do not use, copy or disclose the >>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender >>> immediately. >>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails >>> sent or received. >>> Further communication will signify your consent to >>> this. >>> ----------------------------- >>> From: Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk> >>> Subject: Re: Party: Assignee=everyone >>> Date: September 19, 2013 8:52:40 AM EDT >>> To: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> >>> Cc: "<public-odrl@w3.org>" <public-odrl@w3.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2013-Sep-19, at 13:38, Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 18 Sep 2013, at 01:42, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This sounds like something perhaps could be added to the vocabulary to indicate the conceptual Party representing 'everyone' and which can be used as a @uid wherever that's needed? >>>> We could...what would it look like?...and are there other "fixed" ids of interest? >>> In the RDF variant, we'd express it as a named individual, something like >>> >>> :everyone a :All ; >>> rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ; >>> vs:term_status "testing" ; >>> rdfs:label "Everyone"@en ; >>> rdfs:comment "This is a pre-defined party which can be used when explicitly referring to the set of all possible parties"@en . >>> >>> I'm not sure how it works in the XSD, I'm even less of an expert there :) >>> >>> I'm not sure about fixed IDs for parties, once we've done one adding others should be technically easy if there's consensus. >>> >>> M. >>> >>> -- >>> Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development, >>> Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA, >>> MC3 D6, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ, >>> 0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E >>> >>> >>> > -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 14:09:05 UTC