RE: [ISSUE-55][ACTION-510] Make LQI and LQR similar to mtConfidence in structure.

I agree: what is the rational for forcing the use of standoff notation for spans with a single issue?


-    It may look a bit cramped to a human, but this is processed by machines.

-    Readers still have to implement both ways since it is just a recommendation.




From: Felix Sasaki [] 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 3:47 AM
To: Dave Lewis
Cc: Phil Ritchie;;;
Subject: Re: [ISSUE-55][ACTION-510] Make LQI and LQR similar to mtConfidence in structure.


Hi Dave,

I may have missed your answer to

"It is recommended that only the the stand-off mode of annotation is used and that its:locQualityIssueType, its:locQualityIssueComment, locQualityIssueSeverity, its:locQualityIssueProfileRef and its:locQualityIssueEnabled are not used within trans-unit or alt-trans elements."

Asking here again since just yesterday I had students working with LQI annotations, and the inline approach was much easier in terms of creating, validating and analying the annotations.



Am 17.05.13 11:48, schrieb Dave Lewis:

On 12/05/2013 14:06, Phil Ritchie wrote:

In relation to the question posed about LQR: Can you re-phrase the question. Are you asking if it is required at an inline level? 

Yes. Do you see LQR ever being used inline?



Received on Friday, 17 May 2013 10:33:53 UTC