Re: Output-Example Cocomore

Am 13.05.13 18:37, schrieb Jirka Kosek:
> On 13.5.2013 17:51, Yves Savourel wrote:
>> Maybe we can have a simple processing expectation that says something like:
>>
>> Any non-ITS element or attribute MAY be ignore but MUST be preserved if the document is re-written.
> But, then we are opening new can of worms -- there is no definition of
> what re-written means in the context of ITS :-)
>
> If we doesn't want to spend ages on this we can allow foreign elements
> in its:rules and say that thay can be ignored. Nothing more.

A big +1. I won't be able to chair the wednesday call, but hope that 
Dave / David scan this thread and we then could make the "can be 
ignored" change to the schema and add above sentence.

Best,

Felix

Received on Monday, 13 May 2013 16:56:23 UTC