- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:38:07 +0200
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- CC: Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Am 17.04.13 10:28, schrieb Jirka Kosek: > On 17.4.2013 10:14, Felix Sasaki wrote: >>> No, we just need this for specification. For schema we can rewrite this >>> into regex if there is strong demand for this. >> For the record, I won't demand this - though it would be nice. > Felix, just to explain my reluctance for regex comes from the simple > fact that no regex is better then wrong one. Now with grammar for our > regex subset this is no more issue - almost. For example in past there > were some requests to allow only BMP characters in regex not full > Unicode. It would be very hard to express this in regex for engine that > has full Unicode coverage (which is default for xs:pattern/rng:pattern). Thanks for the explanations, Jirka. I understand and as I said I won't push for the regex in the schema - having the ABNF in the spec would resolve the issue. - Felix
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 08:38:57 UTC