- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:28:13 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 08:28:42 UTC
On 17.4.2013 10:14, Felix Sasaki wrote: >> No, we just need this for specification. For schema we can rewrite this >> into regex if there is strong demand for this. > > For the record, I won't demand this - though it would be nice. Felix, just to explain my reluctance for regex comes from the simple fact that no regex is better then wrong one. Now with grammar for our regex subset this is no more issue - almost. For example in past there were some requests to allow only BMP characters in regex not full Unicode. It would be very hard to express this in regex for engine that has full Unicode coverage (which is default for xs:pattern/rng:pattern). Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 08:28:42 UTC