- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:09:39 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: 'Felix Sasaki' <fsasaki@w3.org>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 22 September 2012 14:10:10 UTC
On 22.9.2012 13:31, Yves Savourel wrote: > But then how can we have a reliable expectations? If a first tool generates one data category markup without tool-information and the next produces the same data category with tool-information, there is no way to be sure any of the tool-information is correct. Hi, sorry for interrupting discussion. But it is really necessary to have such fidelity about tools used? Is there some use-case for annotating each piece of ITS markup with a tool info? Wouldn't it be just sufficient to list tools used, maybe with some flag saying which data categories has been touched by each tool. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 22 September 2012 14:10:10 UTC