- From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:36:46 +0100
- To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Hi Jirka, The tool reference is needed for markup resulting from 'data-driven' processes, especially machine translation and text analytic since these are heavily dependent of the type of algorithm and training data involved - hence knowing the tool or engine used is important when consuming the markup. However, I agree when the process producing the mark up is human or some simple XML processing, e.g. 'translate', 'id-value', then there may be no appreciable benefit. cheers, Dave On 22/09/2012 15:09, Jirka Kosek wrote: > On 22.9.2012 13:31, Yves Savourel wrote: > >> But then how can we have a reliable expectations? If a first tool generates one data category markup without tool-information and the next produces the same data category with tool-information, there is no way to be sure any of the tool-information is correct. > Hi, sorry for interrupting discussion. But it is really necessary to > have such fidelity about tools used? Is there some use-case for > annotating each piece of ITS markup with a tool info? Wouldn't it be > just sufficient to list tools used, maybe with some flag saying which > data categories has been touched by each tool. > > Jirka >
Received on Sunday, 23 September 2012 21:37:11 UTC