Re: Tool info specification (Re: action-221 summary of overriding discussion)

Hi Jirka,

The xml format I proposed in essence is what you describe: a list of
tools and data categories. My proposal to have that as a block of
information meant: not adding that to each element, but providing it
as a general piece of information. I think the use cases of Declan and
Tadej would be satisfied with that. But it seems that Yves use case
needs more?

Best,

Felix

2012/9/22, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>:
> On 22.9.2012 13:31, Yves Savourel wrote:
>
>> But then how can we have a reliable expectations? If a first tool
>> generates one data category markup without tool-information and the next
>> produces the same data category with tool-information, there is no way to
>> be sure any of the tool-information is correct.
>
> Hi, sorry for interrupting discussion. But it is really necessary to
> have such fidelity about tools used? Is there some use-case for
> annotating each piece of ITS markup with a tool info? Wouldn't it be
> just sufficient to list tools used, maybe with some flag saying which
> data categories has been touched by each tool.
> 			
> 					Jirka
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>        Professional XML consulting and training services
>   DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

-- 
Gesendet von meinem Mobilgerät

Received on Saturday, 22 September 2012 16:44:13 UTC