- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:34:47 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 03:35:13 UTC
All good points, Yves. I'd suggest that if nobody protest by Monday we can edit this. Best, Felix 2012/10/23 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> > > Could this create a conflict if we have the > > items in HTML "script" like > > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-locQualityIssue-html5-local-2 > > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-translation-agent-provenance-html5-local-2 > > I don't think it would. > > We said we should have a single root element in each script. > So you would just have several scripts if you have several stand-off > references. > > The only drawback (if you can call that one) is that you would not know in > a single operation what data category the <its:items/its:records> element > holds if you are looking at it without looking from the content referencing > them. But that's probably not a big problem. > > The other aspect (not sure if it's a drawback or an advantage) is that you > could potentially use the same item to hold the stand-off notation of > several different data categories. > > Cheers, > -yves > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 03:35:13 UTC