W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [ISSUE-22] Provenance and Agents

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:34:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL58czpnwh-pAteqPwueTkUj6e2L1DKJADQpb0j=7eQ7JEPgsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
All good points, Yves. I'd suggest that if nobody protest by Monday we can
edit this.

Best,

Felix

2012/10/23 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>

> > Could this create a conflict if we have the
> > items in HTML "script" like
> >
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-locQualityIssue-html5-local-2
> >
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-translation-agent-provenance-html5-local-2
>
> I don't think it would.
>
> We said we should have a single root element in each script.
> So you would just have several scripts if you have several stand-off
> references.
>
> The only drawback (if you can call that one) is that you would not know in
> a single operation what data category the <its:items/its:records> element
> holds if you are looking at it without looking from the content referencing
> them. But that's probably not a big problem.
>
> The other aspect (not sure if it's a drawback or an advantage) is that you
> could potentially use the same item to hold the stand-off notation of
> several different data categories.
>
> Cheers,
> -yves
>
>


-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 03:35:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:31:56 UTC