W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > January 2013

Request for feedback from implemeters (Re: [ISSUE-75] - Domain - 1.)

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:21:39 +0100
Message-ID: <5107F713.6000505@w3.org>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
CC: Ankit Srivastava <asrivastava@computing.dcu.ie>, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, "tadej.stajner@ijs.si" <tadej.stajner@ijs.si>, 'Pablo Nieto Caride' <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>, 'Mauricio del Olmo' <mauricio.delolmo@linguaserve.com>, 'Thomas Ruedesheim' <thomas.ruedesheim@lucysoftware.com>, Milan Karasek <MilanK@moravia.com>, Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>, Philip O'Duffy <philip.ODuffy@ul.ie>, "Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>
Hi Christian, and domain implementers, put in CC taken from 
http://tinyurl.com/its20-testsuite-dashboard

at domain implementers: could you please prepare yourself to give an 
opinion on the proposal of local domain markup on the Wednesday call? If 
you can't attend, can you please state your opinion in this thread?

Thanks,

Felix


Am 29.01.13 16:22, schrieb Lieske, Christian:
>
> Hi,
>
> One of my comments related to “domain” (see 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0022.html) 
> was the following:
>
> 1.       As it stands, "domain" only allows "pointing". Some scenarios 
> may require a "direct encoding" (e.g. via something like 
> its-domain="financials")
>
> Jörg summarized the e-mail exchange related to this as follows (see 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0143.html):
>
> ==
>
> 1. has not been resolved so far. The proposed new feature would allow
>
> for the direct encoding (either through a string value, or an URI/IRI)
>
> of domain information. This feature is supported by at least two
>
> implementers (Pablo and Yves) with their implementation scenarios
>
> (machine translation application, and ITS/XLIFF mapping -- XLIFF does
>
> not have a domain concept). Since the ITS 2.0 domain category has
>
> already been implemented by several (> 5 organizations) including
>
> appropriate test instances, and given the overall process and time frame
>
> of ITS 2.0, it is suggested to reject this comment, and to open an RFE
>
> (ie. new feature/feature extension) for future ITS versions.
>
> ==
>
> From my understanding, we were waiting for comments from the 
> implementers (see Felix’ request to them in 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0090.html) 
> related to the possibility to implement.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christian
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 16:22:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:26 UTC