Re: MATF SCs with no manager, and SCs not yet having Pull request.

Yes, I'll will have the PR in for #70 Orientation by EOD today.  (sorry for
missing this note earlier)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
> wrote:

> Hi David,
> thanks for reminding us all of the time pressure and for giving us this
> status.
>
>
> #60 Target size = (@awkawk) - in the last MATF telco, consensus was that
> we should hold on for this - we did not think that the availabiltiy of zoom
> woud be reason enough not to mandate a minimum target size. We agreed that
> we can reduce size to 44px (iOS recommendations) and have an exception for
> links in inline text (horizontal dimension >= 44 px, vertical dimension
> 22px (maybe even less) so the issue of overlapping links in inline text is
> reduced. We wouls still need an exception for inline text links that have
> to bew short (say, three footnote links 1), 2), 3) after a sentence which
> would be to short to make the 44px horizontal target.
> @awkawk, would you create a pull request for this one even if you
> personally think we don’t need it?
>
> #67 Device sensors (@mraccess77) - Jon, will you create a pull request for
> this?
>
> #66 Pointer input with additional sensors (not assigned) - seems an easy
> target, but perhaps not vital to include
>
> #63 Touch with assistive technology (@joshueoconnor)- people seem to agree
> that as it is unclear whether 2.1.1 can be tweaked we should create a pull
> request on this - Joshue, will you?
>
> #71 Non-interference of AT (@joshueoconnor) reading through issue comments
> there seems to be some consensus that this may not be pushed now and may be
> covered by conformance req 4 and may be addressed in new text in
> Understanding 2.1.1 - so maybe not push this now?
>
> #70 Orientation (@marcjohlic)- there has been discussion but overall
> agreement to advancve this SC with some wording changes (e.g. noting that
> element order does not need to be the same in both orientatons but
> consistent in the respective chosen orientation). Marc, will you be able to
> create a pull request for this in time?
>
> #61 Pointer Gestures (not assigned) - I think this is pretty
> straight-forward and an important requirement for touch users having
> difficulties with complex multi-finger touch gestures. It maz get a lot of
> oushback put it woud bre goof to expose it foir comments. DavidMcDonald
> wrote: This has no SC manager... I can submit this proposal. Time is
> running out. Will you Daivd?
>
> #69 Single key shortcut alternative (@DavidMcDonald) there seems to be
> consensus that this should go forward, maybe with changes suggested by Davd
> - good to get wider feedback on this. Will you create the pull request,
> David?
>
> #68 Speech input (not assigned) - a lot of discussion on the issue what
> the author can do about this problem, whether it is more an AT issue,
> whether it is actually covered elsewhere or should be phrased differently -
> not sure whether this should go forward
>
> Detlev
>
>
> On 13 Feb 2017, at 21:24, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> If we want into the first draft I think we should be making some pull
> requests... and getting our SC into the wider group discussion. There are
> 30 PR already submitted... I've done 2 of them #2 Change of content and #65
> accidental activation.
>
> I can do a PR on #69 single character shortcuts if necessary... it's got
> no SC manager...
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:06 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> 61 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/61> Pointer gestures
>> 69 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/69> Single key shortcut
>> alternative
>> 68 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/68> Speech Input
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ​MAFT SCs which have not yet been submitted for Pull Request... (the cut
>> off is around the corner..)
>> ​
>>
>> 60 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/60> Target Size
>>
>>
>> 67 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/67> Device sensors
>> 66 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/66> Pointer inputs with
>> additional sensors
>> 63 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/63> Touch with Assistive
>> Technology
>> 71 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/71> Non-interference of AT
>> 70 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/70> Orientation
>>
>>
>> 61 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/61> Pointer gestures
>> 69 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/69> Single key shortcut
>> alternative
>> 68 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/68> Speech Input
>> ​
>>
>> ​I tried to clean up #69. Suggested this
>>
>> "Single character shortcuts are not the only way activate a control,
>> unless a mechanism is available to turn them off or remap them to shortcuts
>> with two or more characters."
>>
>>
>> Glossary
>> Single character shortcut: Mechanism added to the content which triggers
>> a control using only one character on the keyboard.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David MacDonald
>>
>>
>> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>> LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>> twitter.com/davidmacd
>> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>>
>>
>> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>> *            Including those with disabilities*
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
>> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>>
>
>
>