- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:54:49 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear Silvia, > BTW: my demo doesn't work in Safari cause Safari doesn't support Ogg > out of the box. Tell ivan to install XiphQT and it will work. Thanks for the explanation, I will :-) > Sounds to me like MPEG-21 all over again, except done with RDFa - > which might indeed be the better approach. I wonder why that couldn't > have been done from within W3C and why a new standards body with extra > membership fees had to be invented. Do you know who's a member yet and > who's driving it? You ask exactly the same question that W3C has asked Manu Sporny :-) He is currently the liaison between these 2 groups. Basically, it seems that this consortium (industrially driven) is afraid to loose control over the standard, the license, etc. if this falls into W3C hands (which is non sense when we know the W3C patent policy). This consortium has yesterday and today a plenary face to face meeting. Manu will come back to us afterwards to see how we could collaborate. This consortium aims to have a huge impact in the industry. They might rely on W3C efforts (media annotations, media fragments) for ensuring the distribution of media content. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 08:56:41 UTC