- From: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:03:50 +0200
- To: <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, "'Media Fragment'" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Erik Mannens'" <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
Hi all, regrets for tomorrow, I will be in a project meeting. Best regards, Davy -- Davy Van Deursen Ghent University - IBBT Department of Electronics and Information Systems - Multimedia Lab URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/dvdeurse On apr 06, 2010 at 09:27, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Cc: Erik Mannens > Subject: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 07 April, Telecon 0900 > UTC > > Dear Media Fragmenters, > > Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=07&month=04&y > e > ar=2010&hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > Actions opened: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open > > Only Conrad and Silvia have indicated me they would prefer to have the > telecon one hour later. Do you have any objections? If not, I will ask > to re-schedule Zakim bridge. Sorry Silvia and Conrad, this week, we > still maintain 09:00 UTC. > > We will mainly discuss: ACTION-152, ACTION-123, and ACTION-154 so we > can publish the doc this Thursday. > We also need to schedule: > - the next F2F meeting (see below for the possibilities) > - when we would like to meet at TPAC 2010 (Thierry's reminder) > Please, confirm your attendance to tomorrow's telecon. > Best regards. > > Erik & Raphaël > > ------------ > > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-04-07 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Wednesday, 07 April *09:00-10:00 UTC* > Local time: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=07&month=04&y > e > ar=2010&hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > > 07 April 2010, 0900 UTC > 0200 (West US) > 1000 (Galway) > 1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria) > 1800 (Tokyo) > 2000 (Sydney) > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) > Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99 > Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152 > Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG") Duration : 60 minutes > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665 > W3C IRC Web Client : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc > Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client > Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim > Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html > Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Chair: Raphael > ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList > Scribe: Conrad (On Deck: Silvia, Michael) > Regrets: Erik, Davy > > Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by > members and invited experts only. > > 1. ADMIN: > * Roll call > * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 03 March 2010 telecon: > http://www.w3.org/2010/03/03-mediafrag-minutes.html > * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 5th F2F meeting: > http://www.w3.org/2010/03/08-mediafrag-minutes.html > http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-mediafrag-minutes.html > > * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications > mailing list and notifications > * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers > ** Postpone (new deadline is May 1st 2010) > > * Next WG F2F: > - 25-30 April in Raleigh, collocated with WWW (HTML5 Track?) > - 01-03 June in Heraklion, collocated with ESWC > - 14-16 June in Sophia Antipolis/Amsterdam > - 25-26 or 28-29 June in New York, collocated with FOMS+OVC > > 2. USE CASES & REQUIREMENTS > > * ACTION-156: Conrad to add a "bandwidth conservation use case" > > 3. SPECIFICATION: > > 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves) > > * ACTION-151: Yves to modify the production rule for the track > dimension in order to allow multiple semi-colon separated values > * ACTION-152: Yves to change the formal syntax to reflect that we > don't need a subdelim for selecting multiple tracks but we allow > multiple track= in the URI > * ACTION-153: Raphael to review the complete document and check > whether there are more references to uniqueness > > 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP: > * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax > * ACTION-154: Yves to add a section 5.2.4 describing his new > optimization > * ACTION-137: Jack to check that 5.1 is implementable using the > protocol > * ACTION-155: Davy to draw diagrams to include in the spec, similar to > Yves's email, that shows which bytes from the headers and body of the > media file are sent > > 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA: > * ACTION-135: Davy, Erik to extend section 7 regarding spatial and > track dimension > * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at > client-side > > 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments: > * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names? > * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > fragment/2009Nov/0014.html > * Silvia's blog post: > http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of- > a-composite-media-resource/ > > * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism > (ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics > > 4. TEST CASES: (Michael) > * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ > * ACTION-146: Jack to identify and add in corrib any missing test > cases for temporal fragments > * ACTION-158: Raphael to enter the big table of all test cases for the > temporal dimension in the wiki > * ACTION-147: Michael to add all MF WG members to corrib > * ACTION-148: Michael to add a copy TC functionality in corrib > * ACTION-149: Michael to come up with a fix for overview vs. edit > single TC in corrib > * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media- > fragment/2009Dec/0015.html > > 5. ISSUES > > 5.1 Active: > > 5.2 Non-Active: > * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding > * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and > Processing > * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test > Cases? > * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) > Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme? > * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register > the fragment scheme for all media types > * ISSUE-14 [Davy]: How to deal with embedded time stamps > * ISSUE-16 [Jack]: Combining axis is probably not going to be done by > LC, but we should write somewhere that this is doable > > 6. IMPLEMENTATION: > * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he > could implement the logic on client side > * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the > logic could be implemented on client side > * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code > doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment > * Someone to investigate whether he could have an implementation in > Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing? > > 7. AOB > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, > 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:04:30 UTC