- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:14:53 -0700
- To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- Cc: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, José Luis Millán <jmillan@aliax.net>, "public-media-capture@w3c.org" <public-media-capture@w3c.org>
On 15 August 2013 16:03, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote: > Much better cloning it. Cloning allows each track being controlled > separately (regardless they both share the same original source). Unless by cloning it you lose synchronization, or you end up with simulcast instead of a single stream. There's no guarantee that a cloned track is rendered synchronously with other tracks from the same source - the only guarantee applies to tracks in the same MediaStream. That's actually unlikely. More to the point, by not cloning, I avoid potential issues with configuration changes causing the source to become overconstrained. And maybe I want to manage changes globally.
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 23:15:21 UTC