Re: RECAP: Conclusion: Cloning and sharing of MediaStreamTracks - worth it? from Iñaki Baz Castillo on 2013-08-15 (public-media-capture@w3.org from August 2013)

From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 01:03:07 +0200
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, José Luis Millán <jmillan@aliax.net>, "public-media-capture@w3c.org" <public-media-capture@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <CALiegf=NPe6Fpi6HyF8zOvt-d0TCayMau0saECHwwkwf9jT_iw@mail.gmail.com>

2013/8/15 Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>:
> Sure, but you could achieve the same synchronization by cloning the desired
> MediaStreamTrack; the new MST would share the original source. As I
> understand it, the question is whether a single MST object can appear in
> multiple MediaStreams (i.e. without cloning).

Much better cloning it. Cloning allows each track being controlled
separately (regardless they both share the same original source).


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 23:03:54 UTC