- From: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 10:48:02 +0100
- To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Hi Thierry, We had already a few Wiki pages summarizing possible test cases: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/TestSuite http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/TestSuite_implementation Werner and me already tried to explain a few times, that testing interfaces is not really a good idea since they are not reachable in most implementations from the outside. There are only few methods, which can be called from outside. I completely share your proposal to have the three different (letīs say) parts - it is also similar to what the fragments are doing (a colleague of mine is conducting tests for them at the moment). At the moment i am not quiet sure how we should proceed. Maybe it is the best choice to continue the discussion in the next teleconf (hopefully with a few participants). I can prepare a proposal for next Tuesday where i collect the tests, which i think that should be made. Best. _____________________________ Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier Chair of Distributed Information Systems University of Passau Innstr. 43 94032 Passau Room 248 ITZ Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 Fax: +49 851 509 3062 stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/ http://twitter.com/fstegmai _____________________________ Am 04.11.2011 um 06:33 schrieb Florian Stegmaier: > Hi Thierry! > > I hope sou have a productive time at TPAC! > > I will discuss this things with Werner today and respond to you soon. > > Let me ask a few questions: > - what is the progress of the WEBAPPS use case? > - Are there any news from Yves regarding the API issues? > - As far as i know it was planned to get in touch with browser vendors - any news about this? > - Have you discussed the UC&Req spec yet? > > Could you please send the link to the minutes? Otherwise it is very hard to follow you :( > > Cheers. > _____________________________ > Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier > Chair of Distributed Information Systems > University of Passau > Innstr. 43 > 94032 Passau > > Room 248 ITZ > > Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 > Fax: +49 851 509 3062 > > stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de > https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/ > http://twitter.com/fstegmai > _____________________________ > > Am 03.11.2011 um 22:12 schrieb Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>: > >> Florian, >> >> Thanks for your implementation. >> >> We need 3 different things >> >> - an API test suite (a set of test cases) >> - an API implementations inputing these test cases >> - an API implementaion report, a document listing the test cases that pass or fail the implementation. >> >> >> We have been thinking that the testsuite should reflect the API functionalities. That is indeed what we need to test. >> The following are probably the interfaces and methods which need to be tested. >> >> Your implementation probably used these or a subset of these interfaces. >> >> So we were thinking of your implementation outputting an additional table for the methods. >> >> This would probably be the way to report the implementation status in our implementaion document. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> >> 4.1 interfaces with multiple methods >> >> 1-MediaResource interface >> - createMediaResource >> - getMediaProperty >> >> 4.2-AsyncMediaResource interface >> >> - getMediaProperty >> - getOriginalMetadata >> - handleEvent ??? >> >> >> 4.3-SyncMediaResource interface >> - getMediaProperty >> - getOriginalMetadata >> >> 4.4-MediaAnnotation interface >> --> has seven attributes: >> * fragmentIdentifier >> * language >> * mappingType >> * propertyName >> * sourceFormat >> * statusCode >> * value >> >> >> >> 4.6-MetadataSource interface >> --> has two attributes: >> * metadataSource >> * sourceFormat
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 09:51:10 UTC