- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 16:51:53 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On 05/16/2011 03:34 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >> Hi Sylvia >> >> Providing an RDF file was decided back at the MAWG F2F in Lyon. >> And it is mentioned in our exit Criteria for CR. >> >> Therefore if providing an RDF file is not possible for OGG we should etheir >> change our exit criterie, else formats not providing an RDF would be removed >> from the spec. > > It is possible. I can throw an RDF together to list all the fields > available. I just don't think it makes much sense for metadata that is > encapsulated in a binary file. And this includes other formats such as > QuickTime, too. Silvia, the purpose of the RDF file is precisely to convey, in a uniform way, the metadata encapsulated in the original format(s). I don't see how the fact that the original format is binary or not makes it more or less relevant... pa
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 14:52:18 UTC