Re: RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update

Le 19/07/2011 20:37, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> The updated webpage.
>
> I believe I am done.
>
> Another comments: in the main ontology document, in the list of mapped vocabularies, I would prefer EBUCore to be listed as 'ebucore' and not 'ebuc'. Thanks.

Updated
see
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#metadata-formats-in-scope

and
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

Best,

Thierry


>
> Regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: mardi, 19. juillet 2011 08:28
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update
>
> Jean Pierre,
>
> Be marked as so:
> "RDF Files marked in [green] are done as it pass the editors guidelines)".
> see
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>
> Let me know if your files do conform to these guidelines and I will mark
> them as done.
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guidelines_for_ontology_examples.html
>
> We will have a review latter on to check these files before going to PR.
>
>
> If you have write access just edit the HTML page and save it in place
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mappings_tested/EBUCore.htm
>
> If you don't, just save the HTML file locally, edit it and send it back
> to me in an attachment. I will upload it.
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry.
>
> Le 18/07/2011 18:32, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>> What do you mean by be marked as so?
>>
>> How can I edit the page?
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> De : Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
>> Date d'envoi : lundi, 18. juillet 2011 10:48
>> À : Evain, Jean-Pierre
>> Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Objet : Re: RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update
>>
>> Jean-Pierre,
>>
>> Thanks for your files. It is now published.
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>>
>> Are these conformant to the guidelines ?
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guideline
>> and be marked as so ?
>>
>> Also one last bit,  could you please update the "Tested" column in the
>> Mapping table for your format linked from
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mappings_tested/
>>
>>
>> and you will be done.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> Le 17/07/2011 12:57, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>>> Dear Michel,
>>>
>>> I have already sent the EBUCore.
>>>
>>> The extended TVA XML and RDF files are attached and have been validated by the Manchester OWL validator.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Jean-Pierre
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
>>> Date d'envoi : vendredi, 8. juillet 2011 14:47
>>> À : public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>> Objet : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update
>>>
>>> Dear RDF editors,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your work to provide multimedia metadata formats examples
>>> associated with RDF files. These are collected in our testsuite [1].
>>>
>>> During our last F2F WG meeting, we have checked these files. Currently
>>> a large number are either missing information, invalid, missing
>>> properties, etc.
>>>
>>> Please refer to the minutes of the F2F meeting, were each files has
>>> been scanned.
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/06/28-mediaann-minutes.html
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/06/29-mediaann-minutes.html
>>>
>>> As we must provide valid and complete RDF files to exit CR, we have
>>> written guidelines in order to achieve this goal.
>>> Please follow the 3 procedures from the guidelines:
>>>           1- RDF Example editing and validation
>>>           2- Examples  validation with the Media Ontology
>>>           3- Mapping table update
>>>
>>> As described in the guidelines [2].
>>>
>>>
>>> The deadline for providing final RDF files is 7th of August. Make sure
>>> your files fulfill the guidelines.
>>>
>>> All formats not fulfilling the guidelines will have to be removed from
>>> the ontology spec in order to allow the spec to enter PR.
>>>
>>> We are now very near the end of REC track. This work will be your last
>>> contribution allowing  to exit CR and enter PR. Your input is really
>>> critical.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite
>>> .html
>>>
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guideline
>>> s_for_ontology_examples.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> **************************************************
>>> This email and any files transmitted with it
>>> are confidential and intended solely for the
>>> use of the individual or entity to whom they
>>> are addressed.
>>> If you have received this email in error,
>>> please notify the system manager.
>>> This footnote also confirms that this email
>>> message has been swept by the mailgateway
>>> **************************************************

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 13:10:16 UTC