- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:50:53 +0900
- To: Joakim Sderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mjs@apple.com, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, Interaction <w3t-ia@w3.org>
I'm sorry for our delay in getting a response back to the Media Annotations WG about this. I am discussing it with the chairs and we make sure we get back to you with a response by the end of this week. --Mike Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, 2010-09-21 14:48 +0200: > Dear HTML chairs, > > Could you please acknowledge our previous email. > > Regards, > > Thierry michel > Staff contact for the MAWG > > > > Le 13/09/2010 19:00, Thierry MICHEL a crit : > >Hi, > > > >The Media Annotations WG is currently discussing/responding to its LC > >comments. > > > >We have send on 01 Jun 2010 a schedule, and asked the HTML WG if it > >would fit your agenda. No response, which we interpret as "our schedule > >is fine" ;-) > > > >Then on 09 Jun 2010, we have sent the official Last Call Working Draft > >transition announcement [2] for the following two Recommendation Track > >specifications: > > > >* API for Media Resource 1.0 > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-20100608 > > > >* Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608 > > > >The Last Call period for these documents ended on July 11, 2010. > > > >We haven't received your review from the HTML WG. Could you please let > >us know that you have no comments on these documents. > > > >Furthermore, today we have a specific issue of binding between HTML5 and > >MAWG needed. > > > >We have received a substantial comment [3] about the API for Media > >Resource 1.0 as follows: > >"Example on how to introduce this in HTML5 by making the > >HTMLMediaElement inherit from the MediaResource interface:" This > >shouldn't be an example. If a user agent is expected to expose this > >interface on media elements, then this has to be a MUST, possibly using > >an "implements" statement. > > > >This LC comment refers to section "3.1 MediaResource interface" > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-20100608/#mediaresource-interface > > > > > >and more specifically about the example provided in section > >"4. Usage examples" > >Example 1: Return the name of the director of the movie "Apocalypse now". > >//assume that the video elements in HTML5 inherit from the MediaResource > >interface > >video = document.getElementsByTagName("video"); > > > >Stating a MUST in our spec seems unreliable, regarding the current > >advancement of HTML5. > > > >What is needed to get an object that implements the interface, > >HTMLMediaElement and inheritance issue from the MediaResource interface > > > > > >Thank you for your advise on this issue. > > > >Thierry, > >on behalf of the MAWG. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >[1] > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jun/0023.html > > > >[2] > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jun/0023.html > > > > > >[3] > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Aug/0017.html > > > -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 23:51:04 UTC