- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:38:39 +0200
- To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
- CC: 'Yves Raimond' <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
I certainly didn't want to make this personal, so let's de-passionate the debate and talking only on the core matters. You first told us about supposed behaviors of FOAF that we have never seen, looking at only what is important, the machine readable version of the FOAF ontology (and not a particular rendering in a particular tool). > The point I made is disconnected from this as although this is a old > debate it seems there are still doubts on what should preferably be > used for operational implementation. I point you to precise questions. There are no doubts about operational implementation as soon as you know how the ontology will be used, what are its purpose. I would not recommend to develop OWL Full ontologies if the core matters is to do complex reasoning or if it is important to have all the good answers to a query. That's why, I asked you what was the purpose of the ontology. > This is a question for which I > have much more sympathy than floating in cyberspace using 'cool' > tools. Who talked about 'cool' tools or features or whatever? > Still you neither said anything I didn't know > nor brought a convincing argument in favour of FULL. I simply don't understand what are your issues. The question you are asking has no general answer, or if you prefer, the answer is "it depends" ... thus again, asking clarification, see my questions. Their only purpose is not to bother you, but just identifying precisely what you need to adopt the best technology ... this is also why we have flavors and profiles for OWL and OWL2. And by the way, this is the first thing that ontology engineering best practices recommend to do (not me saying this :-). Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 21:41:29 UTC