Re: OGG container

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:

>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/test.php?table=containerOGG
>
> Le 21/09/2010 16:00, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>
>  Hi Thierry,
>>
>> I saw the two sections and my reply was indeed targeted at the container
>> format section. As I said: skeleton should be regarded as part of the
>> container format and because Skeleton includes metadata, it should be
>> counted (see
>>
>> http://github.com/cpearce/OggIndex/blob/master/Skeleton-4.0-Index-Specification.txt
>> ).
>> My point was that all of the information you are after is already included
>> in the previous table everywhere where it says "skeleton".
>>
>
>
> I guess in this previous metadata table, all these information which are
> now redondant with the OGG container table, should be removed.
>
> OGG container table:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/test.php?table=containerOGG
>


Well, no, not really. Because as soon as the container has audio-visual data
in it, it ticks a lot more boxes on your list. If you remove that table, how
will people be able to find out about those feature mappings?

Regards,
Silvia.