RE: editing responses to LC comments

Hi. Veronique.

I added inline comment as below.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Veronique Malaise
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 11:34 PM
> To: tmichel@w3.org
> Cc: Joakim Söderberg; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: editing responses to LC comments
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I am back from a week of meetings, and ready to implement the changes
> that are listed as action points for me. WonSuk, could you please
> confirm me that I can work on the documents on Thursday? I will update
> the new version on Thursday, if it is ok on your side? 

Sure. You can do that in Thursday. No before ;)
Thanks~

Best regards,
Wonsuk.

>I re-checked to
> be sure: I have only editorial changes to do, can someone confirm that
> I do not have any answer to send to LC-commenters on behalf of the
> group?
> 
> Best regards,
> Véronique
> 
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
> 
> > LC comment Editors,
> >
> > If you have an Action Item to draft a response to a LC comment,
> > please do so before the next telecon on tuesday.
> >
> > All the LC comment which were discussed during the F2F, have the "WG
> > Notes:" filled in and status set to "proposal"  [step3]
> >
> > You should draft the response in the "Proposed Resolution:" field
> > and set the status to "pending" [step4]
> >
> > During the next telecon we will agree on the Proposed Resolution and
> > in that case should set the status to "resolved-yes" [step5]
> >
> > For the above steps please refer to
> > Guidelines for Using W3C Last Call Tracker Tool.
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/guidelines-tracker-tool.html

> >
> >
> > thierry.
> >
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 03:54:27 UTC