- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:28:41 +0200
- To: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Right. maybe for each entry we should have - LC Comments Number - date - description Log file example: - [LC 2393] 2001-09-09 : added a new informative section to show how to use the ontology in other W3C technologies like POWDER, RDFa, ect. - [LC 2393] 2001-09-09 : added a POWDER example ... and in the spec : <p class="added-in-CR"> This paragraph explains how to use the ontology in other W3C technologies like POWDER, RDFa </p> and this claas attribute could be used in headers <h2>, <h3> and <span> depending on the update. this will really help tracking the differences in CR from LC. thierry. Le 08/09/2010 18:50, 이원석 a écrit : > Hi. Thierry. > Thanks for good example. > > I think I can do this work for CR Specs based on our Last Call WDs. > Is it OK? > > Best regards, > Wonsuk. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] >> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:56 AM >> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org; 이원석 >> Subject: example of a change log tracking editing changes in CR >> >> >> >> Wonsuk, >> >> Here is an example of a change log tracking editing changes in the CR >> document. >> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/CR/WebCGM21- >> Appendix.html#webcgm_changelog >> >> An another thing we could also do is to highlighted in the text itself >> using a class="added-in-CR" >> >> with some CSS associated styling. >> >> Thierry
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2010 07:29:04 UTC