RE: Update API document

Hi. Felix, Chris and all.

Most of all, thanks for Felix and Chris’s revision.

I updated the API doc with Felix’s file. In addition I commit two files(XML and HTML) from Felix to the CVS repository. Because I guess Thierry is on the trip at this moment ;)

So you can take a look at the last version of API doc via below link.

http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-1.0.html

 

Best regards,

Wonsuk.

 

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 9:20 PM
To: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: Update API document

 

Hi Chris, all,

2010/2/25 Chris Poppe <chris.poppe@ugent.be>

Now I really changed the subject of the mail so that people are not confused.

Kind regards,
Chris
-- 
Ghent University - Multimedia Lab
Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41
B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

tel: +32 9 264 89 17
fax: +32 9 264 35 94
e-mail: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be

URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be




---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
From: "Chris Poppe" <chris.poppe@ugent.be>
To: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:25:40 +0100
Subject: RE: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting
Dear all,

please find attached an updated version of the API document (both xml file and html file) (I am having troubles to upload this).

Felix, after you add your updates could you please upload this?




I made the updates, but unfortunately I am also currently not able to commit to CVS. Thierry, could you do that? See

http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/ma-api-doc-20100226.zip

The ZIP-File contains an HTML-version of the draft, the XML-source, and a diff between Chris' version and mine, to show you my edits. If there are further comments today, I can make another editing round tonight. Btw., I changed some of the non-webservice examples, since the output seemed inconsistent, e.g. the writing conventions for DOMString result types are not always the same. Also a question: should we have one convention for properties names with multiple words, e.g. "named fragments"? I would propose to use small caps and a hyphen always, e.g. "named-fragments". What do people think?

Best,

Felix

 

	
	Current changes:
	added subtypes/roles
	added information on the use of the API (two use case scenarios)
	created new interface to hold language attribute.
	created new interface to hold uri, sourceformat, fragmentidentifier and mappingtype
	Updated the document with information on how to use the subtypes
	
	
	Kind regards,
	Chris
	
	-- 
	Ghent University - Multimedia Lab
	Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41
	B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
	
	tel: +32 9 264 89 17
	fax: +32 9 264 35 94
	e-mail: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be
	
	URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be