Re: Suggestion how to move the mapping table forward

Agree - it would be much easier to discuss this at the physical meeting
when we all sit together.

However, if I recall correctly from the last telecon, we said that we
wanted to publish the table in March already, this would mean that we
should invest some time before the meeting. (see comment from Joakim in
the minutes of the last meeting,
http://www.w3.org/2009/03/03-mediaann-minutes.html).
@Joakim: what was the final decision about the publication date?

I also agree to your other comment: there are much more heavier mapping
cases in the table than the mapping of ID3 ;-)

Best,

Tobias

Evain, Jean-Pierre schrieb:
> Good to see that we finally recognise the problem ;-) although I would still
> suggest that this is done during the next physical meeting considering the
> need to consolidate understanding on some of the attributes of sets richer
> (although les cryptic) than ID-3.
>
> JP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Chris Poppe
> Sent: vendredi, 6. mars 2009 10:25
> To: 'Tobias Bürger'; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Suggestion how to move the mapping table forward
>
> I agree with Tobias and think that this can speed up the finalization of the
> mapping table.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Chris Poppe
>  
> Ghent University - IBBT
> Faculty of Engineering
> Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS)
> Multimedia Lab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201
> B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent
> Belgium
>  
>
> t: +32 9 33 14959
> f: +32 9 33 14896
> t secr: +32 9 33 14911
> e: chris.poppe@ugent.be
>  
>
>  
> URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] Namens Tobias Bürger
> Verzonden: vrijdag 6 maart 2009 9:52
> Aan: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Onderwerp: Suggestion how to move the mapping table forward
>
> Dear all,,
>
> I had a look at the current version of the mapping table again
> yesterday. From the discussion we had regarding ID3 I think that not
> every mapping is 100% correct or at least leaves room for changes. And
> what I also learned is that the meaning of some properties get clearer
> when you discuss them with other members of the group.
>
> I think we could improve the mappings if we make small groups to review
> the mappings. Each group can pick 1 or 2 formats and then we could
> discuss points of the mappings which are not clear.
>
> Having these reviews is necessary if we want to publish the mapping
> table, I guess.
>
> Perhaps we agree on small teams in the next telecon to review the
> mappings - what do you think?
>
> At the next telecon all group members should have indicated their
> preferences via the questionaire, so there would be a basis for the
> definition of the groups. We can also then prioritize some formats. So
> just an idea...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tobias
>
>   

-- 
_________________________________________________
Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Tobias Bürger

STI Innsbruck
University of Innsbruck, Austria
http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/

tobias.buerger@sti2.at
__________________________________________________

Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 09:56:31 UTC