- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 19:04:17 +0900
- To: Chris.Poppe@ugent.be
- Cc: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>, public-media-annotation@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ba4134970903060204v409f0332pfc22b81374cc1734@mail.gmail.com>
2009/3/6 Chris Poppe <Chris.Poppe@ugent.be> > I agree with Tobias and think that this can speed up the finalization of > the > mapping table. I agree with Tobias and Chris, this is a very good idea. Nevertheless I would like to make this effort independent of the draft publication schedule. We will not "loose our face" ;) with unappropriate mappings being made public (we are working in public anyway), and gathering feedback from outside the group is as important as consensus within the group. Felix > > > Kind regards, > > Chris Poppe > > Ghent University - IBBT > Faculty of Engineering > Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS) > Multimedia Lab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 > B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent > Belgium > > > t: +32 9 33 14959 > f: +32 9 33 14896 > t secr: +32 9 33 14911 > e: chris.poppe@ugent.be > > > > URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] Namens Tobias Bürger > Verzonden: vrijdag 6 maart 2009 9:52 > Aan: public-media-annotation@w3.org > Onderwerp: Suggestion how to move the mapping table forward > > Dear all,, > > I had a look at the current version of the mapping table again > yesterday. From the discussion we had regarding ID3 I think that not > every mapping is 100% correct or at least leaves room for changes. And > what I also learned is that the meaning of some properties get clearer > when you discuss them with other members of the group. > > I think we could improve the mappings if we make small groups to review > the mappings. Each group can pick 1 or 2 formats and then we could > discuss points of the mappings which are not clear. > > Having these reviews is necessary if we want to publish the mapping > table, I guess. > > Perhaps we agree on small teams in the next telecon to review the > mappings - what do you think? > > At the next telecon all group members should have indicated their > preferences via the questionaire, so there would be a basis for the > definition of the groups. We can also then prioritize some formats. So > just an idea... > > Best regards, > > Tobias > > -- > _________________________________________________ > Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Tobias Bürger > > STI Innsbruck > University of Innsbruck, Austria > http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ > > tobias.buerger@sti2.at > __________________________________________________ > > > > >
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 13:36:29 UTC