- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:39:28 +0900
- To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 14:40:05 UTC
Hi all, just FYI, I recently asked 3 groups of my students who have not been involved in MAWG or metadata at all to analyse a few of our formats and to come up with a "top 10" of categories - in 30 minutes. Below are the results. Interesting IMO is that this is quite similar to what MAWG has come up so far - an encouraging result. Contributor / Author (Creator) Date Description Format Indentifier Title Type Language Publisher URL Subject/Category Creator/Name Title Date/Published Description/Content/Summary Language Format Type Source/ID URL media:title media:keywords (dc:subject) media:description (dc:description) yt:location (dc:description) media:category media:rating yt:lastname (dc:creator) yt:firstname (dc:creator) yt:username (dc:creator) yt:recorded (dc:date) yt:uploaded (dc:date) Best, Felix
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2009 14:40:05 UTC