- From: Chris Poppe <Chris.Poppe@ugent.be>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:24:34 +0200
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>, <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2F45C68F84DC4F308E9C525AC34F5BB0@elis.UGent.be>
It is also interesting that the students only needed 30 minutes to come up with those lists. Nevertheless, it is indeed encouraging that the chosen properties are relevant for "non-technical" people! Chris Poppe Ghent University - IBBT Faculty of Engineering Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS) Multimedia Lab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent Belgium t: +32 9 33 14959 f: +32 9 33 14896 t secr: +32 9 33 14911 e: <mailto:chris.poppe@ugent.be> chris.poppe@ugent.be URL: <http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be> http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be _____ Van: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] Namens Felix Sasaki Verzonden: dinsdag 16 juni 2009 16:39 Aan: public-media-annotation@w3.org Onderwerp: Find the "top 10" of multimedia categories .. in 30 minutes Hi all, just FYI, I recently asked 3 groups of my students who have not been involved in MAWG or metadata at all to analyse a few of our formats and to come up with a "top 10" of categories - in 30 minutes. Below are the results. Interesting IMO is that this is quite similar to what MAWG has come up so far - an encouraging result. Contributor / Author (Creator) Date Description Format Indentifier Title Type Language Publisher URL Subject/Category Creator/Name Title Date/Published Description/Content/Summary Language Format Type Source/ID URL media:title media:keywords (dc:subject) media:description (dc:description) yt:location (dc:description) media:category media:rating yt:lastname (dc:creator) yt:firstname (dc:creator) yt:username (dc:creator) yt:recorded (dc:date) yt:uploaded (dc:date) Best, Felix
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 08:26:47 UTC