- From: Victor Rodriguez Doncel <victorr@ac.upc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:24:15 +0100
- To: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Dear Tobias, all > > For FRBR samples you might look at: http://openfrbr.org/ > Well, it is a good starting point. But it would be better from a real-world dataset and from video records. > I have a comment to your mapping: You "mapped" the properties to > dc:source; I guess they also could be seen mapped to dc:relation or > xmpMM:derivedFrom > You are right, xmpMM:derivedFrom is perfect. The only good report on DC & FRBR was found here: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/data-models/draft-report.html , written more than 10 years ago, and it relies also on dc:Relation - I propose it too, that Excel row can be further expanded. Thanks for your comments, Víctor > What do you think? > > Best, > > Tobias > > Victor Rodriguez Doncel wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I attach a modified version of the mapping including a mapping to >> FRBR. <http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/FRBR> >> >> My concern is whether we need sample metadata records. >> FRBR is widely used in bibliographic records (including video), but >> currently I have found no public FRBR metadata records. >> For example, Europeana <http://www.europeana.eu/> -the European >> digital Library- manages 2 million records (videos among them)- is >> expected to have FRBR support by 2010 <http://frbr.bnportugal.pt/>... >> >> Regards, >> Víctor >> >> Tobias Bürger escribió: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Please find attached the mapping table with my input, i.e. mappings >>> to EXIF, MediaRDF, SearchMonkey Media, LOM and METS. >>> >>> I failed to upload it to the Wiki (the system said that the file is >>> corrupt...). >>> >>> FYI: The METS mapping is very basic as METS typically includes other >>> formats to describe technical or descriptive information. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Tobias >>> >> >
Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 15:24:57 UTC