- From: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:22:02 +0100
- To: Victor Rodriguez Doncel <victorr@ac.upc.edu>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Hi Victor, I guess having sample metadata records is a must for our next stage in which we dig deeper into the mapping. For FRBR samples you might look at: http://openfrbr.org/ I have a comment to your mapping: You "mapped" the properties to dc:source; I guess they also could be seen mapped to dc:relation or xmpMM:derivedFrom What do you think? Best, Tobias Victor Rodriguez Doncel wrote: > Dear all, > > I attach a modified version of the mapping including a mapping to > FRBR. <http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/FRBR> > > My concern is whether we need sample metadata records. > FRBR is widely used in bibliographic records (including video), but > currently I have found no public FRBR metadata records. > For example, Europeana <http://www.europeana.eu/> -the European > digital Library- manages 2 million records (videos among them)- is > expected to have FRBR support by 2010 <http://frbr.bnportugal.pt/>... > > Regards, > Víctor > > Tobias Bürger escribió: >> Dear all, >> >> Please find attached the mapping table with my input, i.e. mappings >> to EXIF, MediaRDF, SearchMonkey Media, LOM and METS. >> >> I failed to upload it to the Wiki (the system said that the file is >> corrupt...). >> >> FYI: The METS mapping is very basic as METS typically includes other >> formats to describe technical or descriptive information. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tobias >> > -- _________________________________________________ Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Tobias Bürger STI Innsbruck University of Innsbruck, Austria http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ tobias.buerger@sti2.at __________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 19 January 2009 14:22:39 UTC