Re: F2F 3 and call for comments

2009/4/24 Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>

> Dear Victor, all,
>
> > What do you think about this division?
>
> I agree that this makes sense.
>
> > About the 4.2.2., a discussion was started some weeks ago,
> > with the examples of the date formats and the "FirstName" +
> > "LastName" =  "Name" example, but no conclusion was reached.
>
> This is probably going to be a longer discussion, so we might want to
> postpone that to the next version of the document.
>
> > I would like to foster the debate again: What do you think
> > about using XSLT or SWRL in order to express these transformations?
>
> I think that it is very important to have several slices of conformance (as
> we discussed in Ghent), in order to also allow for an informal specification
> of the syntactic mapping. I think that e.g. SWRL would frighten off too many
> developers.


+1.

Felix


>
>
> Best regards,
> Werner
>
>
> > Joakim Söderberg escribió:
> >
> >       Folks,
> >
> >       The third F2F was successfully conducted at UPC in Barcelona.
> >
> >       Thanks to the hosts and all present participants! You
> > did a really good job and we had some very constructive and
> > discussions.
> >
> >
> >
> >       As a result of this meeting we now have a set of "Media
> > Annotations Attributes". It is a very important result since
> > it will be the foundation of our second publication "Media
> > Entity Ontology".
> >
> >       THIS IS CALL TO ALL PARTICIPANTS OF MEDIA ANNOTATIONS
> > WG TO PLEASE STUDY THIS TABLE AND PROVIDE COMMENTS! The table
> > can be found on our Wiki:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Top_Supported_Tags
> >
> >
> >
> >       Best regards
> >
> >       Joakim
> >
> >
> >
>