Hello! I also agree with the stated changes. I think these will be good adaptation! Best regards, Florian @all: Have a nice weekend! Am 24.04.2009 um 15:27 schrieb Felix Sasaki: > > > 2009/4/24 Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at> > Dear Victor, all, > > > What do you think about this division? > > I agree that this makes sense. > > > About the 4.2.2., a discussion was started some weeks ago, > > with the examples of the date formats and the "FirstName" + > > "LastName" = "Name" example, but no conclusion was reached. > > This is probably going to be a longer discussion, so we might want > to postpone that to the next version of the document. > > > I would like to foster the debate again: What do you think > > about using XSLT or SWRL in order to express these transformations? > > I think that it is very important to have several slices of > conformance (as we discussed in Ghent), in order to also allow for > an informal specification of the syntactic mapping. I think that > e.g. SWRL would frighten off too many developers. > > +1. > > Felix > > > > Best regards, > Werner > > > > Joakim Söderberg escribió: > > > > Folks, > > > > The third F2F was successfully conducted at UPC in Barcelona. > > > > Thanks to the hosts and all present participants! You > > did a really good job and we had some very constructive and > > discussions. > > > > > > > > As a result of this meeting we now have a set of "Media > > Annotations Attributes". It is a very important result since > > it will be the foundation of our second publication "Media > > Entity Ontology". > > > > THIS IS CALL TO ALL PARTICIPANTS OF MEDIA ANNOTATIONS > > WG TO PLEASE STUDY THIS TABLE AND PROVIDE COMMENTS! The table > > can be found on our Wiki: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Top_Supported_Tags > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Joakim > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 13:31:48 UTC