RE: F2F 3 and call for comments

Dear Victor, all, 

> What do you think about this division?

I agree that this makes sense.

> About the 4.2.2., a discussion was started some weeks ago, 
> with the examples of the date formats and the "FirstName" + 
> "LastName" =  "Name" example, but no conclusion was reached. 

This is probably going to be a longer discussion, so we might want to postpone that to the next version of the document.

> I would like to foster the debate again: What do you think 
> about using XSLT or SWRL in order to express these transformations? 

I think that it is very important to have several slices of conformance (as we discussed in Ghent), in order to also allow for an informal specification of the syntactic mapping. I think that e.g. SWRL would frighten off too many developers.

Best regards,
Werner


> Joakim S÷derberg escribiˇ: 
> 
> 	Folks,
> 
> 	The third F2F was successfully conducted at UPC in Barcelona. 
> 
> 	Thanks to the hosts and all present participants! You 
> did a really good job and we had some very constructive and 
> discussions.
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	As a result of this meeting we now have a set of "Media 
> Annotations Attributes". It is a very important result since 
> it will be the foundation of our second publication "Media 
> Entity Ontology".
> 
> 	THIS IS CALL TO ALL PARTICIPANTS OF MEDIA ANNOTATIONS 
> WG TO PLEASE STUDY THIS TABLE AND PROVIDE COMMENTS! The table 
> can be found on our Wiki:
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Top_Supported_Tags
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	Best regards
> 
> 	Joakim
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 13:23:35 UTC