- From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:22:41 +0200
- To: Victor Rodriguez Doncel <victorr@ac.upc.edu>, Veronique Malaise <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear Victor, all, > What do you think about this division? I agree that this makes sense. > About the 4.2.2., a discussion was started some weeks ago, > with the examples of the date formats and the "FirstName" + > "LastName" = "Name" example, but no conclusion was reached. This is probably going to be a longer discussion, so we might want to postpone that to the next version of the document. > I would like to foster the debate again: What do you think > about using XSLT or SWRL in order to express these transformations? I think that it is very important to have several slices of conformance (as we discussed in Ghent), in order to also allow for an informal specification of the syntactic mapping. I think that e.g. SWRL would frighten off too many developers. Best regards, Werner > Joakim Söderberg escribió: > > Folks, > > The third F2F was successfully conducted at UPC in Barcelona. > > Thanks to the hosts and all present participants! You > did a really good job and we had some very constructive and > discussions. > > > > As a result of this meeting we now have a set of "Media > Annotations Attributes". It is a very important result since > it will be the foundation of our second publication "Media > Entity Ontology". > > THIS IS CALL TO ALL PARTICIPANTS OF MEDIA ANNOTATIONS > WG TO PLEASE STUDY THIS TABLE AND PROVIDE COMMENTS! The table > can be found on our Wiki: > > > > > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Top_Supported_Tags > > > > Best regards > > Joakim > > >
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 13:23:35 UTC