- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:07:45 +0200
- To: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Dear Joakim, > First accept my apologies for missing the telephone conference; I am not > familiar with W3C procedures. I expected a notification email that the > group had started to work, since I reported my interest to participate > about six months ago. Yep, is it possible Felix to have WG participants automatically subscribed to the public mailing list? [...] > Some other issues I have came across are item matching (how do you > identify a work), distinction between description of the work (editorial > metadata) and its instantiations (manifestations) and cross content > recommendations. Do you mean the distinction one can find, for example, in the FRBR model (Work - Expression - Manifestation - Item) [1], in the VRA model (Work versus Image) [2], in the CRM model (Information Carrier versus Information Object) [3], or in the MPEG-7 model (MediaInstance versus MediaProfile)? Do you think such distinction should be available in the future Media Ontology this group will propose? Do you have any use cases where such a distinction is important for describing videos? Best regards. Raphaël [1] http://www.frbr.org/ [2] http://www.vraweb.org/ [3] http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/ -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 19:08:29 UTC