- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:44:28 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 25 November 2012 15:28, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <pablo@glatelier.org> wrote: >>> I believe that what is currently used, should be the "smallest" >>> sub-set. So, following our example, including underlines, trailing >>> hashes should be our baseline, core profile, or w/e. Regarding this is >>> a very simple/lightweight markup I don't see why we should be >>> complicating things more. >> >> I disagree with this approach, as being too complex. > > Fine. How we are going to decide it? > >>> Anyway, we can't "vote" header syntax by itself. We should decide if >>> we are going to take a "profile sub set driven profile" or not. >> >> I'll leave it to you to resolve this one Pablo, since you objected to >> the prior poll. > > I don't understand... I didn't want to vote on that poll (header > syntax) because I believe we have a bigger issue that we haven't > solved yet (if it has been solved, then please tell me where is the > discussion). I tried an approach to resolve your dislike of simpler header markup. You objected. You object again, but don't put forward an alternative. I leave it to you to resolve with the group Pablo. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 25 November 2012 15:44:56 UTC