Re: header syntax.

On 25 November 2012 12:24, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 November 2012 15:15, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C.
> <pablo@glatelier.org> wrote:
>
>
>> I believe that what is currently used, should be the "smallest"
>> sub-set. So, following our example, including underlines, trailing
>> hashes should be our baseline, core profile, or w/e. Regarding this is
>> a very simple/lightweight markup I don't see why we should be
>> complicating things more.
>
> I disagree with this approach, as being too complex.

Fine. How we are going to decide it?

>> Anyway, we can't "vote" header syntax by itself. We should decide if
>> we are going to take a "profile sub set driven profile" or not.
>
> I'll leave it to you to resolve this one Pablo, since you objected to
> the prior poll.

I don't understand... I didn't want to vote on that poll (header
syntax) because I believe we have a bigger issue that we haven't
solved yet (if it has been solved, then please tell me where is the
discussion).

Regards,
--
Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX
http://www.glatelier.org/
http://about.me/pablox/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/
Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/

Received on Sunday, 25 November 2012 15:29:29 UTC