- From: Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <pablo@glatelier.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:58:11 -0300
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 25 November 2012 12:44, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25 November 2012 15:28, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. > <pablo@glatelier.org> wrote: > >>>> I believe that what is currently used, should be the "smallest" >>>> sub-set. So, following our example, including underlines, trailing >>>> hashes should be our baseline, core profile, or w/e. Regarding this is >>>> a very simple/lightweight markup I don't see why we should be >>>> complicating things more. >>> >>> I disagree with this approach, as being too complex. >> >> Fine. How we are going to decide it? >> >>>> Anyway, we can't "vote" header syntax by itself. We should decide if >>>> we are going to take a "profile sub set driven profile" or not. >>> >>> I'll leave it to you to resolve this one Pablo, since you objected to >>> the prior poll. >> >> I don't understand... I didn't want to vote on that poll (header >> syntax) because I believe we have a bigger issue that we haven't >> solved yet (if it has been solved, then please tell me where is the >> discussion). > > I tried an approach to resolve your dislike of simpler header markup. > You objected. > You object again, but don't put forward an alternative. I didn't object, I asked if this was discussed earlier and I didn't know about. My "objection" could be totally out of place. Regards, -- Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX http://www.glatelier.org/ http://about.me/pablox/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/
Received on Sunday, 25 November 2012 15:59:11 UTC