- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:47:51 -0600
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Alastair, Jon and all, If Jon is okay with "available by any input method", I am okay with taking out his "available on focus as well as hover" point. Jon? We made "not covered or obscured" part of the "fully visible" definition hence we removed it from the bullet list. The original issue was not not tooltips obscuring other content. The original issue the cursor overlapping the tooltip content making the tooltip text unreadable. Check the illustrations: http://simplyaccessible.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/400percentTitleAttribute.png https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_footnotes.png https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_glossary.png https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_mail.png https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_firefox.png The idea of content appearing on hover obscuring other content was added later. So now we are trying to incorporate both issues in this one SC. Thanks. Kindest Regards, Laura On 11/17/16, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Laura, > > I think “available by any input method” covers “available on focus as well > as hover”, we only need the “any” version. > > The “not covered or obscured” has disappeared from the wiki, and in the > email thread it has switched back again, or I’m going crazy? I thought the > problem was the content appearing on hover obscuring other content, in which > case it should be: > > Informational content which appears on hover that is necessary for > understanding must: > * be fully visible; > * not obscure other content; > * be available via any input method. > > For the testability section I updated it to match (it is a rather similar to > the SC, is that ok?), and I added a possible new technique. > > Sounded like a productive meeting in the minutes, I should be there next > week ☺ > > -Alastair > > > On 17/11/2016, 20:13, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The latest is at: > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover > > Alastair, any thoughts on verbiage to update the testablity section? > > All ideas for improvement most welcome. > > Kindest regards, > Laura > > > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:48:27 UTC