W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Metadata On Hover SC Text

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:59:51 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOavpvcrmMukfC_YUgYjC9n1x7f28tM=GEGjohbnV-ZUA7krvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Thanks Jon,

I'll remove that bullet point.

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On 11/17/16, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alastair, Jon and all,
>
> If Jon is okay with "available by any input method", I am okay with
> taking out his "available on focus as well as hover" point. Jon?
>
> We made "not covered or obscured" part of the "fully visible"
> definition hence we removed it from the bullet list.
>
> The original issue was not not tooltips obscuring other content. The
> original issue the cursor overlapping the tooltip content making the
> tooltip text unreadable. Check the illustrations:
>
> http://simplyaccessible.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/400percentTitleAttribute.png
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_footnotes.png
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_glossary.png
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_mail.png
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/File:Obscured_tooltip_firefox.png
>
> The idea of content appearing on hover obscuring other content was
> added later. So now we are trying to incorporate both issues in this
> one SC.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
> On 11/17/16, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
>> Hi Laura,
>>
>> I think “available by any input method” covers “available on focus as
>> well
>> as hover”, we only need the “any” version.
>>
>> The “not covered or obscured” has disappeared from the wiki, and in the
>> email thread it has switched back again, or I’m going crazy? I thought
>> the
>> problem was the content appearing on hover obscuring other content, in
>> which
>> case it should be:
>>
>> Informational content which appears on hover that is necessary for
>> understanding must:
>> * be fully visible;
>> * not obscure other content;
>> * be available via any input method.
>>
>> For the testability section I updated it to match (it is a rather similar
>> to
>> the SC, is that ok?), and I added a possible new technique.
>>
>> Sounded like a productive meeting in the minutes, I should be there next
>> week ☺
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>> On 17/11/2016, 20:13, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     The latest is at:
>>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover
>>
>>     Alastair, any thoughts on verbiage to update the testablity section?
>>
>>     All ideas for improvement most welcome.
>>
>>     Kindest regards,
>>     Laura
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 22:00:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:23:23 UTC